Florida Hospital Sues to Evict Patient 5 Months After Discharge

Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare says patient's continued stay ties up a room needed for other patients

Mar. 19, 2026 at 2:19am

Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare has sued a patient who has refused to leave a hospital room for over five months after being discharged. The hospital says the patient's continued occupancy is preventing the room from being used for other patients in need of acute care.

Why it matters

This case highlights the challenges hospitals face when patients refuse to leave after being discharged, which can disrupt the hospital's ability to serve other patients in need. It also raises questions about patient rights, hospital policies, and the legal mechanisms available to address such situations.

The details

According to the lawsuit, the patient was admitted to Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare for medical treatment and was formally discharged on October 6th after it was determined she no longer needed acute care services. The hospital says it has repeatedly made efforts to coordinate the patient's departure with family members and offered transportation to obtain necessary identification, but the patient has refused to leave.

  • The patient was discharged on October 6th, 2025.
  • The hospital filed the lawsuit in early March 2026, over 5 months after the patient's discharge.

The players

Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare

A hospital in Tallahassee, Florida that has sued a patient who refuses to leave a hospital room over 5 months after being discharged.

The Patient

A patient who has refused to leave a hospital room at Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare for over 5 months after being discharged.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Defendant's continued occupancy prevents use of the bed for patients needing acute care”

— Rachel Givens, Attorney for Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare

What’s next

An online court hearing on the hospital's lawsuit is scheduled for the end of March 2026, where a judge will decide whether to order the patient to vacate the hospital room.

The takeaway

This case highlights the complex issues hospitals face when patients refuse to leave after being discharged, underscoring the need for clear policies, patient rights protections, and legal mechanisms to address such situations in a way that balances the needs of all patients.