Cardi B Defeats Copyright Lawsuit Over 'Enough' Hit Single

Judge dismisses case, citing lack of jurisdiction over the rapper and her record label.

Mar. 30, 2026 at 7:51pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

An abstract close-up photograph of sparkling gold sequins and shattered disco ball fragments, conveying the high-energy glamour and commercial success of Cardi B's music.The dismissal of a copyright lawsuit over Cardi B's hit single 'Enough (Miami)' preserves the song's commercial success and the rapper's creative freedom.Today in Miami

Cardi B has successfully defended herself against a copyright infringement lawsuit over her hit single 'Enough (Miami).' A judge dismissed the case, ruling that the court lacks jurisdiction over the rapper and her co-defendants at Atlantic Records.

Why it matters

This case highlights the challenges musicians face in defending their creative work against copyright claims, especially when high-profile artists are involved. The ruling underscores the importance of establishing proper legal jurisdiction when filing such lawsuits.

The details

Musical duo Kemikal956, comprised of Joshua Fraustro and Miguel Aguilar, had sued Cardi B and Atlantic Records, alleging that 'Enough (Miami)' copied a song featured in the FX series 'Reservation Dogs.' However, the judge found that the court did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendants, and also determined that the plaintiffs' claims would have been subject to dismissal even if jurisdiction had been established.

  • The lawsuit was filed in March 2026.
  • The judge dismissed the case on March 30, 2026.

The players

Cardi B

A Grammy-winning rapper known for hit songs like 'Bodak Yellow' and 'I Like It.'

Atlantic Records

The record label that represents Cardi B and released her hit single 'Enough (Miami).'

Kemikal956

A musical duo comprised of Joshua Fraustro and Miguel Aguilar, who filed the copyright infringement lawsuit against Cardi B and Atlantic Records.

Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr.

The judge who dismissed the copyright infringement lawsuit against Cardi B and Atlantic Records.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Even if personal jurisdiction existed, each of Plaintiff's causes of action would be subject to dismissal for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”

— Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr., U.S. District Judge

What’s next

The plaintiffs may choose to refile the lawsuit in a different court that has proper jurisdiction over Cardi B and Atlantic Records.

The takeaway

This case underscores the complexities musicians face in defending their creative work against copyright claims, especially when high-profile artists are involved. The ruling highlights the importance of establishing proper legal jurisdiction when filing such lawsuits.