Judge Permanently Blocks Release of Trump Classified Documents Report

Former special counsel Jack Smith's final investigation into Trump's handling of classified records at Mar-a-Lago will remain confidential.

Published on Feb. 24, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal judge in Florida has permanently blocked the Justice Department from making public former special counsel Jack Smith's final report detailing his investigation into President Donald Trump's handling of classified records at Mar-a-Lago. The judge cited concerns over fairness, potential exposure of grand jury material, and attorney-client communications protected under a previous court order.

Why it matters

This ruling prevents the public from accessing the findings of a high-profile investigation into alleged mishandling of classified documents by a former president, raising questions about transparency and accountability in the political process.

The details

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon ruled that Smith's report must remain confidential, citing her earlier determination that his appointment as special counsel was unconstitutional. The judge sharply criticized Smith for continuing to compile the report after the dismissal of charges, describing his actions as a 'brazen stratagem.' She concluded that publishing the document would undermine 'basic notions of fairness and justice,' especially since the charges were dismissed before trial and no jury reached a verdict.

  • On February 24, 2026, Judge Cannon issued a permanent order blocking the release of the report.

The players

Jack Smith

Former special counsel who investigated President Trump's handling of classified records at Mar-a-Lago.

Aileen Cannon

U.S. District Judge who ruled to permanently block the release of Smith's final report.

Donald Trump

Former president whose handling of classified records at Mar-a-Lago was the subject of Smith's investigation.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Judge Cannon's courage and judicial resolve on these important due process issues should be recognized and taught in law school classrooms across America. Jack Smith was unconstitutionally appointed and his unlawful investigation was improperly funded with tens of millions of U.S. taxpayers' hard earned dollars. Any and all fruit of Smith's poisonous tree should be treated accordingly and should never see the light of day.”

— Kendra Wharton, Trump's attorney

“Judge Cannon's decision to permanently block the release of this extraordinarily significant report is impossible to square with the First Amendment and the common law. There is no legitimate basis for its continued suppression.”

— Scott Wilkens, Knight First Amendment Institute

“The public deserves access to findings funded by taxpayers.”

— Chioma Chukwu, American Oversight

What’s next

The nonprofit groups American Oversight and the Knight First Amendment Institute have appealed Judge Cannon's decision to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The takeaway

This ruling highlights the ongoing tensions between transparency and national security concerns, as well as the complex legal and political issues surrounding the investigation into a former president's handling of classified materials.