Judge Permanently Blocks Release of Trump Classified Documents Report

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith's final investigation into Trump's handling of classified records at Mar-a-Lago will remain confidential.

Published on Feb. 24, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal judge in Florida has permanently blocked the Justice Department from making public former special counsel Jack Smith's final report detailing his investigation into President Donald Trump's handling of classified records at Mar-a-Lago. The judge cited concerns over fairness, potential exposure of grand jury material, and attorney-client communications protected by a 2023 court order.

Why it matters

This decision denies public access to the findings of a high-profile investigation into alleged mishandling of classified documents by a former president, raising questions about transparency and accountability in the justice system.

The details

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon ruled that Smith's report must remain confidential, citing her earlier determination that his appointment as special counsel was unconstitutional. The judge sharply criticized Smith for continuing to compile the report after the dismissal of charges against Trump, describing his actions as a 'brazen stratagem.' She concluded that publishing the document would undermine 'basic notions of fairness and justice' since the charges were dismissed before trial and no jury reached a verdict.

  • In July 2023, Cannon dismissed the criminal case against Trump and his co-defendants after concluding that Smith's role as special counsel was unlawfully established.
  • In December 2023, Smith stood by his findings in a closed-door congressional deposition.

The players

Jack Smith

Former special counsel who investigated Trump's handling of classified records at Mar-a-Lago.

Aileen Cannon

U.S. District Judge who permanently blocked the release of Smith's final report.

Donald Trump

Former president accused of willfully retaining sensitive national security documents after leaving office.

Kendra Wharton

Attorney for Donald Trump, who praised the judge's decision.

Scott Wilkens

Representative of the Knight First Amendment Institute, which criticized the decision to block the report's release.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Judge Cannon's courage and judicial resolve on these important due process issues should be recognized and taught in law school classrooms across America. Jack Smith was unconstitutionally appointed and his unlawful investigation was improperly funded with tens of millions of U.S. taxpayers' hard earned dollars. Any and all fruit of Smith's poisonous tree should be treated accordingly and should never see the light of day.”

— Kendra Wharton, Attorney for Donald Trump (kpua.net)

“Judge Cannon's decision to permanently block the release of this extraordinarily significant report is impossible to square with the First Amendment and the common law. There is no legitimate basis for its continued suppression.”

— Scott Wilkens, Representative of the Knight First Amendment Institute (kpua.net)

What’s next

The nonprofit American Oversight and the Knight First Amendment Institute have appealed Judge Cannon's decision to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The takeaway

This ruling highlights the ongoing tensions between transparency and national security concerns in high-profile investigations involving former presidents, raising questions about the public's right to access information funded by taxpayer dollars.