Judge Permanently Blocks Release of Trump Classified Documents Probe Report

Former special counsel Jack Smith's final report on Trump's handling of classified records at Mar-a-Lago will remain confidential.

Published on Feb. 24, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal judge in Florida has permanently blocked the Justice Department from making public former special counsel Jack Smith's final report detailing his investigation into President Donald Trump's handling of classified records at Mar-a-Lago. The judge ruled that the report must remain confidential, citing her earlier determination that Smith's appointment violated the Constitution.

Why it matters

This decision denies the public access to the findings of a high-profile investigation into a former president's alleged mishandling of classified documents, raising concerns about government transparency and accountability.

The details

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon sharply criticized Smith for continuing to compile the report after the dismissal of the charges, describing his actions as a 'brazen stratagem.' The judge concluded that publishing the document would undermine 'basic notions of fairness and justice,' especially since the charges were dismissed before trial and no jury reached a verdict.

  • On February 24, 2026, a federal judge in Florida permanently blocked the release of the report.
  • Last July, Cannon dismissed the criminal case against Trump and his co-defendants after concluding that Smith's role as special counsel was unlawfully established.

The players

Aileen Cannon

A U.S. District Judge in Florida who ruled to permanently block the release of the report.

Jack Smith

The former special counsel who investigated President Donald Trump's handling of classified records at Mar-a-Lago.

Donald Trump

The former president who was the subject of the investigation into his handling of classified records at Mar-a-Lago.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Judge Cannon's courage and judicial resolve on these important due process issues should be recognized and taught in law school classrooms across America. Jack Smith was unconstitutionally appointed and his unlawful investigation was improperly funded with tens of millions of U.S. taxpayers' hard earned dollars. Any and all fruit of Smith's poisonous tree should be treated accordingly and should never see the light of day.”

— Kendra Wharton, Trump's attorney (bigtalkerradio.com)

“Judge Cannon's decision to permanently block the release of this extraordinarily significant report is impossible to square with the First Amendment and the common law. There is no legitimate basis for its continued suppression.”

— Scott Wilkens (bigtalkerradio.com)

“The public deserves access to findings funded by taxpayers.”

— Chioma Chukwu (bigtalkerradio.com)

What’s next

The nonprofit American Oversight and the Knight First Amendment Institute have appealed Judge Cannon's decision to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The takeaway

This ruling denies the public access to the findings of a high-profile investigation into a former president's alleged mishandling of classified documents, raising concerns about government transparency and accountability, and the scope of judicial authority in such sensitive cases.