- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Miami Beach Today
By the People, for the People
JPMorgan Chase Sued Over Alleged $328M Orlando Crypto Ponzi Scheme
Banking giant accused of processing $253 million in suspicious transactions while ignoring fraud red flags
Mar. 17, 2026 at 3:37pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A federal lawsuit alleges that JPMorgan Chase processed $253 million in suspicious transactions from a $328 million crypto Ponzi scheme run by the CEO of Goliath Ventures in Orlando, Florida. Investor Robby Alan Steele claims the bank ignored obvious red flags, leading to losses for over 2,000 victims. The fallout also involves claims against an Atlanta law firm and an investment entity, highlighting broader issues of institutional oversight in the crypto industry.
Why it matters
This case raises concerns about the role of major banks in enabling fraud and the lack of adequate scrutiny over suspicious crypto transactions. When financial institutions fail to properly vet questionable activity, it leaves retail investors vulnerable to losing their savings in scams. The broader implications touch on the need for stronger regulations and oversight in the crypto space to protect consumers.
The details
According to the lawsuit, Christopher Delgado, the 34-year-old CEO of Goliath Ventures, allegedly turned $328 million in investor funds into his personal luxury lifestyle, including an $8.5 million mansion, exotic cars, and lavish parties. The scheme promised investors 3-8% monthly returns through cryptocurrency liquidity pools, but in reality, only $1.5 million actually went toward crypto operations, while Delgado allegedly used new investor money to pay earlier victims in a classic Ponzi scheme.
- From January 2023 through June 2025, JPMorgan Chase processed $253 million in suspicious transactions from the Goliath Ventures scheme.
- On February 24, 2026, Delgado was arrested on wire fraud and money laundering charges, and investor payments stopped, leaving victims scrambling.
- A court-appointed receiver is now working to recover assets from the collapsed scheme.
The players
Christopher Delgado
The 34-year-old CEO of Goliath Ventures, who is accused of running a $328 million crypto Ponzi scheme and using the funds for his personal luxury lifestyle.
Robby Alan Steele
An investor who lost roughly $650,000, including retirement savings, in the Goliath Ventures scheme and has filed a federal lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase.
JPMorgan Chase
The banking giant that is accused of processing $253 million in suspicious transactions from the Goliath Ventures scheme while allegedly ignoring fraud red flags.
Alston & Bird
The prestigious Atlanta law firm that faces accusations of drafting misleading 'joint venture agreements' designed to evade securities oversight.
T & C Investing Corp.
An investment entity that invested $1.1 million in the Goliath Ventures scheme and received $211,000 before the scheme collapsed, leading to a separate fraud claim against Goliath Ventures.
What’s next
A court-appointed receiver is now working to recover assets from the collapsed Goliath Ventures scheme, but the process of compensating the over 2,000 victims is expected to be complex and lengthy.
The takeaway
This case highlights the need for stronger regulations and oversight in the crypto industry to protect consumers from fraudulent schemes. It also raises questions about the role of major financial institutions in enabling such scams and the lack of adequate scrutiny over suspicious transactions.


