Kennedy Reshapes Vaccine Committee, Potentially Sidestepping Court Ruling

New charter broadens qualifications, allows Health Secretary to reconstitute advisory panel despite judge's order

Apr. 9, 2026 at 9:36pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A glowing, neon outline of a syringe or vaccine vial against a dark background, conceptually representing the contentious debate over vaccine policy and public health.The revamped vaccine advisory committee could reshape national immunization policy, raising concerns about the influence of anti-vaccine advocates.Washington Today

The Trump administration has published a new charter for the federal vaccine advisory committee that would allow Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to reclaim his changes to national vaccine policy, despite a recent federal court ruling blocking those decisions. The revised charter broadens the qualifications for committee members and may allow Kennedy to reconstitute the panel with some or all of its previous members, potentially resuscitating at least some of their controversial recommendations.

Why it matters

The move is the latest in an ongoing battle over vaccine policy under the Kennedy administration, which has already faced legal challenges and public confusion over shifting recommendations. The new charter appears aimed at giving Kennedy more control over the advisory committee and its decisions, which could further undermine public trust in vaccine guidance.

The details

The new charter revises the makeup and purpose of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), placing a heavy emphasis on vaccine safety and including 'recovery from serious vaccine injuries' as a qualifying expertise. This aligns with a petition filed by lawyer Aaron Siri, who has long advocated alongside Kennedy against mandatory vaccines. The changes may allow Kennedy to reconstitute the committee with some or all of its previous members, potentially resuscitating their decisions that were blocked by the recent federal court ruling.

  • In March 2026, a federal judge ruled against Kennedy's changes to the ACIP, freezing the committee and reversing many of its recent decisions.
  • On April 9, 2026, the Trump administration published the new ACIP charter, potentially allowing Kennedy to sidestep the court's order.

The players

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The Health Secretary under the Trump administration, who has pushed controversial changes to national vaccine policy.

Aaron Siri

A lawyer who has long advocated alongside Kennedy against mandatory vaccines and petitioned for changes to the ACIP charter.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

The acting head of the CDC, who has delayed publication of a report showing the effectiveness of the Covid vaccine.

Dr. Demetre Daskalakis

The former director of the CDC's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, who criticized the effort to sow doubt about effective vaccines.

Richard Hughes

A lawyer representing the medical organizations that sued the administration over changes to the ACIP.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This isn't a good-faith effort to right the wrongs in our lawsuit. It's a calculated effort to shift the focus and balance of the committee to advance an anti-vaccine agenda.”

— Richard Hughes, Lawyer for medical organizations

“This change is an important step toward assuring individualized care for each child rather than vaccinating children like cattle. To be clear, that should be the case for all vaccines, but it should, at the very least, be the case for the ones that do not prevent infection and transmission.”

— Aaron Siri, Lawyer

“The ongoing effort to sow doubt on vaccines that have prevented millions of illnesses and deaths by indicating that they don't work well enough to be recommended routinely is unconscionable.”

— Dr. Demetre Daskalakis, Former director, CDC National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases

What’s next

It is unclear whether Kennedy will nominate new members to the reconstituted ACIP committee or bring back at least some of the previous members. The administration's next moves will determine the future direction of national vaccine policy.

The takeaway

The administration's efforts to reshape the ACIP committee and potentially sidestep a court ruling highlight the ongoing battles over vaccine policy, which have already led to public confusion and eroded trust in public health guidance. The outcome could have significant implications for vaccine recommendations and requirements across the country.