Judge Rules Trump Not Immune From Capitol Riot Civil Claims

Ruling allows civil lawsuits against former president to proceed over his role in January 6th attack.

Apr. 1, 2026 at 11:10pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A federal judge has ruled that former President Donald Trump is not immune from civil lawsuits alleging he incited the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. The decision marks a significant step forward in one of the last remaining legal challenges stemming from the riot, though an appeal is widely expected.

Why it matters

This ruling allows the civil lawsuits against Trump to proceed, potentially holding him financially accountable for the consequences of the January 6th attack. It also reinforces the principle that even a sitting president is not above the law when it comes to inciting violence.

The details

Judge Amit Mehta determined that Trump's remarks at the 'Stop the Steal' rally immediately preceding the Capitol breach 'plausibly' constitute incitement not protected by the First Amendment. However, the judge stipulated that Trump is protected from liability for actions clearly within his official presidential capacity, such as remarks made from the Rose Garden during the riot.

  • On January 6, 2021, the attack on the U.S. Capitol occurred.
  • In February 2022, Judge Mehta rejected a previous attempt by Trump to dismiss the lawsuits brought by Democratic members of Congress and law enforcement officers.
  • On April 1, 2026, Judge Mehta ruled that Trump is not immune from civil lawsuits alleging he incited the January 6th attack.

The players

Judge Amit Mehta

A federal judge who has ruled that former President Donald Trump is not immune from civil lawsuits alleging he incited the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Donald Trump

The former President of the United States who is facing civil lawsuits over his role in the January 6th attack on the Capitol.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We fight. We fight like hell and if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore.”

— Donald Trump

What’s next

Trump's legal team is almost certain to appeal Judge Mehta's ruling, potentially to the Supreme Court. This appeal could delay the trial for months, or even years. If the ruling is upheld, the case will move forward to discovery and eventually a trial, where evidence will be presented and a jury will decide whether Trump is liable for inciting the riot.

The takeaway

This ruling is a significant legal setback for former President Trump, as it allows the civil lawsuits against him to proceed and potentially hold him financially accountable for the consequences of the January 6th attack. The case raises important questions about the limits of presidential speech and the accountability of political leaders, and could set a precedent for future cases involving political speech and incitement.