Trump Administration Accused of Weaponizing Justice Department

Federal judge quashes subpoenas against Fed Chair Powell, citing lack of evidence of criminal activity

Mar. 31, 2026 at 2:48am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A dimly lit, cinematic government office space with a lone desk and chair, the warm sunlight casting long shadows and creating a sense of solitude and unease, conceptually representing the politicization of federal institutions.The Trump Administration's alleged misuse of the Justice Department to target political opponents raises alarms about the erosion of democratic norms and the rule of law.Washington Today

The Trump Administration's attempt to create a criminal case against Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell is being criticized as a textbook instance of the corrupt use of law enforcement for political purposes. A federal judge has quashed subpoenas issued by the Justice Department, saying there is a 'mountain of evidence' that the purpose was to pressure Powell to lower interest rates or resign, despite the government's lawyer admitting they had no evidence of criminal misconduct.

Why it matters

This case highlights concerns about the Trump Administration's alleged politicization of the Justice Department, using criminal investigations for pretextual reasons related to the former president's political goals or need for retaliation. It raises questions about the independence of federal law enforcement and the rule of law.

The details

The Justice Department had sought a subpoena to search through Powell's records related to a $2.5 billion building renovation, in an apparent attempt to find something to justify an indictment. However, Federal Judge James Boasberg ruled that the government provided 'zero evidence' of a crime, and that the 'mountain of evidence' suggested the real purpose was to pressure Powell to vote to lower interest rates or resign.

  • On March 3, the government's lawyer admitted they 'do not know at this time' what evidence there is of fraud or criminal misconduct by Powell.
  • Two weeks ago, Judge Boasberg quashed the subpoenas issued by the Justice Department against Powell.

The players

Jerome Powell

The current Chair of the Federal Reserve Board.

James Boasberg

A federal judge who quashed the subpoenas issued by the Justice Department against Powell.

Jeanine Pirro

The Washington U.S. attorney who launched the failed probe against Powell.

G.A. Massucco-LaTaif

The government's lawyer assigned to the case, who admitted they had no evidence of criminal activity by Powell.

Donald Trump

The former President of the United States, whose administration is accused of weaponizing the Justice Department for political purposes.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“A 'mountain of evidence' suggests that the purpose of the subpoenas is to pressure Mr. Powell to vote to lower interest rates or to resign.”

— Judge James Boasberg, Federal Judge

“Justice Department lawyers 'do not know at this time' what evidence there is of fraud or criminal misconduct, arguing only that the project was $1.2 billion over budget and that 'it doesn't seem right'.”

— G.A. Massucco-LaTaif, Government Lawyer

What’s next

It remains to be seen if the Justice Department will pursue any further legal action against Powell or if this case will be dropped entirely.

The takeaway

This case highlights the growing concerns about the politicization of the Justice Department under the Trump Administration, raising questions about the independence of federal law enforcement and the rule of law. It serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of using criminal investigations for political purposes.