Pam Bondi Moves to Military Base Amid Threats

Attorney General cites threats from cartels and irate Americans as reason for relocation.

Published on Mar. 11, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

According to a New York Times report, Attorney General Pam Bondi has moved out of her Washington, D.C. apartment and into military housing on a nearby base. The move comes after Bondi has faced growing threats, including from Venezuelan cartels and frustrated Americans upset with her handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case.

Why it matters

Bondi's relocation to a military base is the latest example of Trump administration officials seeking heavily guarded government housing due to safety concerns, a trend that raises questions about the security challenges facing top officials and the appropriate use of taxpayer resources.

The details

The New York Times report states that Bondi moved into military housing after facing numerous threats since the Trump administration's decision to capture Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro in January. At the same time, a growing number of Americans are increasingly frustrated with Bondi's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Other Trump administration officials who have relocated to military facilities include Stephen Miller, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.

  • Bondi moved into military housing in March 2026.

The players

Pam Bondi

The Attorney General of the United States.

Nicolás Maduro

The Venezuelan dictator captured by the Trump administration in January.

Stephen Miller

The President's top domestic policy adviser and architect of his hard-line immigration policy.

Marco Rubio

The current Secretary of State.

Kristi Noem

The former Homeland Security Secretary.

Pete Hegseth

The current Defense Secretary.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

The takeaway

Bondi's relocation highlights the security challenges facing top government officials and the Trump administration's willingness to utilize military resources for the protection of political appointees, raising concerns about the appropriate use of taxpayer funds and resources.