DC Bar Seeks to Sanction Former Interim US Attorney Over DEI Letter

The bar accuses Ed Martin of trying to coerce Georgetown Law to end diversity programs.

Published on Mar. 11, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The District of Columbia Bar has initiated disciplinary proceedings against former interim U.S. Attorney Ed Martin, accusing him of trying to coerce Georgetown Law School to end its diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs during his time in the role from January to May 2025.

Why it matters

This case highlights ongoing tensions around DEI initiatives in higher education, with some arguing they promote discrimination, while others see them as crucial to fostering inclusive environments. The actions of a former federal prosecutor are now being scrutinized by the local bar association.

The details

In a letter to Georgetown Law Dean William Treanor, Martin alleged the school was 'teaching and promoting' DEI as part of its curriculum, though he did not specify how. The D.C. Bar has accused Martin of violating its rules of professional conduct, and if found guilty of misconduct, he could face disbarment, suspension of his law license, or other sanctions.

  • Martin served as interim U.S. Attorney from January to May 2025.
  • The D.C. Bar initiated disciplinary proceedings against Martin on March 10, 2026.

The players

Ed Martin

Former interim U.S. Attorney for Washington, D.C. who is accused of trying to coerce Georgetown Law to end its DEI programs.

William Treanor

Dean of Georgetown University Law Center, who received a letter from Martin alleging the school was 'teaching and promoting' DEI.

District of Columbia Bar

The local bar association that has initiated disciplinary proceedings against Martin for alleged misconduct during his time as interim U.S. Attorney.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

If found guilty of misconduct, Martin could face disbarment, suspension of his law license, or other sanctions from the D.C. Bar.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing tensions around diversity initiatives in higher education, with some arguing they promote discrimination while others see them as crucial to fostering inclusive environments. The actions of a former federal prosecutor are now being scrutinized by the local bar association, underscoring the sensitive and politically-charged nature of these debates.