HHS Warns States Against Removing Kids Over Gender Identity Disputes

The Trump administration is urging states to stop removing children from their homes without parental approval over gender identity issues.

Published on Mar. 5, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Trump administration is warning states that they cannot remove children from their homes over gender identity disputes without parental approval. The Health and Human Services Department's Administration for Children and Families (ACF) has sent a letter to state child welfare agencies reminding them that under federal law, they are barred from removing children from their home because a parent doesn't agree with the child's gender identity.

Why it matters

This move by the Trump administration is part of a broader push to eliminate protections for transgender youth. While the administration argues that parents have the right to reject their child's self-identification, critics say child welfare professionals need discretion to assess when rejection crosses the line into real harm.

The details

The ACF letter cites examples from Illinois to California where children who identify as a different gender than the sex they were assigned at birth have been removed from their homes without parental consent and placed in the child welfare system. However, advocates say they are not aware of any state actually removing children from parents based solely on the parents' response to a transgender child.

  • On November 13, 2025, President Donald Trump signed the Fostering the Future executive order.
  • During his State of the Union address last week, Trump called for a federal ban on gender transitions for minors.

The players

Alex Adams

ACF Assistant Secretary who wrote the letter to states.

Shannon Minter

Vice president of legal at the National Center for LGBTQ Rights (NCLR), who says he is not aware of any state removing children from parents based on their response to a transgender child.

Morissa Ladinsky

A clinical professor in pediatrics at Stanford University in California, who argues that children aren't typically removed from their home without parental consent in this fashion.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services.

Elizabeth Warren

A U.S. Senator who, along with other congressional Democrats, previously sent a letter to Kennedy criticizing the agency's alleged "disregard" for child welfare.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“When states overstep their bounds, ACF will take action to deter inappropriate policies that drive unnecessary interactions with child welfare systems. This is one such example.”

— Alex Adams, ACF Assistant Secretary (ABC News)

“No one is advocating for removing children because a parent is struggling to understand, but child welfare professionals need the discretion to assess when rejection crosses the line into real harm -- the same way they would for any other child.”

— Shannon Minter, Vice president of legal at the National Center for LGBTQ Rights (NCLR) (ABC News)

“My experience tells me that there is likely more to the story.”

— Morissa Ladinsky, Clinical professor in pediatrics at Stanford University (ABC News)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.