Supreme Court Overturns Trump's Tariffs, Raising Questions About Refunds

Economists argue Trump's trade deficit views are misguided, as Congress faces pressure on tariff policy ahead of 2026 midterms.

Feb. 24, 2026 at 10:24pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Supreme Court has overturned much of President Donald Trump's signature tariff regime, with the 6-3 decision dealing a major blow to his 'wrongheaded mercantilist view of international trade.' Economists argue the trade deficit is not an economic problem for ordinary consumers, as long as it can be financed. However, the tariffs have hit farmers especially hard, and Democrats are now calling for refunds of the 'unlawful duties' paid by businesses. This puts vulnerable congressional Republicans in a bind ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, where tariff policy could be a key issue.

Why it matters

The Supreme Court's ruling undermines a key part of Trump's economic agenda, raising questions about the future of his protectionist trade policies. It also puts pressure on Congress to address the tariff issue, which could have political ramifications in the 2026 midterm elections.

The details

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to overturn much of Trump's tariff regime, with the majority opinion stating that the 1974 Trade Act does not empower the president to unilaterally levy tariffs. This comes after Trump lashed out at the court's 'disloyal' justices and vowed 'to do absolutely 'terrible' things to foreign countries.' Economists argue Trump's views on trade deficits are misguided, as long as the U.S. can finance the deficit. However, the tariffs have hit farmers especially hard, leading the National Farmers Union to call on Congress to ensure trade policy supports, not undermines, family farmers and ranchers.

  • On Friday, Trump raged at the Supreme Court's decision and immediately erected 10% tariffs on the world, revising those upward to 15% over the weekend, via social media.
  • Last week, the conservative National Review argued that Trump's boast about reducing the trade deficit by 78% was undercut by his own Census Bureau data showing just a 0.2% decline.

The players

Donald Trump

The former president who implemented a signature tariff regime that has now been largely overturned by the Supreme Court.

Steve H. Hanke

A Johns Hopkins economist who wrote for Fortune Magazine that Trump's views on trade deficits are 'wrongheaded' and based on 'mercantilism.'

Rob Larew

The president of the National Farmers Union, who called on Congress to ensure trade policy supports, not undermines, America's family farmers and ranchers.

Neal Katyal

A lawyer who successfully argued for repealing Trump's tariffs to the Supreme Court, and is now calling for tariff refunds to be paid to businesses.

Charlie Sykes

An anti-Trump conservative commentator who warned that the tariff issue could put the Republican-controlled Congress in a serious bind ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)

“Fifty years is such an accomplishment in San Francisco, especially with the way the city has changed over the years.”

— Gordon Edgar, grocery employee (Instagram)

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.