- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Riverside Today
By the People, for the People
Neighbors Oppose Proposed Waterfront Home in Riverside
Residents raise concerns over environmental impact, setbacks, and loss of mature oak tree at 22 Shoal Point Lane
Published on Feb. 10, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The Greenwich Planning & Zoning Commission discussed an application from 22 Shoal Property LLC for a new single-family home at 22 Shoal Point Lane in Riverside. Neighbors voiced strong opposition, citing concerns over the proposed home's size, proximity to the waterfront, disturbance of the site, and loss of a mature oak tree. The application remains open as the commission awaits further feedback from the state Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP).
Why it matters
This case highlights the ongoing tensions between development and environmental preservation in coastal communities. Residents are concerned the proposed home would negatively impact the local ecosystem, increase flood risks, and disrupt the character of the neighborhood. The outcome could set a precedent for future waterfront projects in the area.
The details
The applicant, 22 Shoal Property LLC, is proposing a new 4,847-square-foot home on the .5073-acre property. The site previously had a home that was demolished in 2018. Neighbors have submitted photos and videos showing the property's mature trees and vegetation that have since been cleared. Conservation officials noted the site has been substantially altered, affecting the tree canopy and habitat. The applicant plans to remove the last remaining 24-foot oak tree on the lot. Residents are also concerned about the proposed use of fill to raise the grade and build a basement, which they argue would exacerbate flooding issues in the area.
- The property was sold to the current owners, Marilyn Bastide Weissman and Alan Weissman, for $4,000,000 in May 2025.
- The previous home on the lot was demolished in 2018.
The players
22 Shoal Property LLC
The applicant seeking approval to build a new single-family home on the 22 Shoal Point Lane property.
Marilyn Bastide Weissman and Alan Weissman
The current owners of the 22 Shoal Point Lane property, who are seeking to build their "dream house" on the site.
Greenwich Planning & Zoning Commission
The local government body responsible for reviewing and approving the application for the new home at 22 Shoal Point Lane.
Hannah and Christopher Peck
Neighbors who own the property at 21 Shoal Point Lane and are opposing the application.
Lucas and Elizabeth Durst
Neighbors who own the property at 18 Shoal Point Lane and are opposing the application.
What they’re saying
“The point I got from a lot of these emails is people are looking for a higher degree of sustainability.”
— Margarita Alban, Chair, Greenwich Planning & Zoning Commission (greenwichfreepress.com)
“This house will be 20 ft taller than my home. These basements and other exclusions to FAR are thousands and thousands of square feet.”
— Christopher Peck, Neighbor at 21 Shoal Point Lane (greenwichfreepress.com)
“I know there's a way to save the tree. We've fine with variances to moving towards the street. Just protect the waterfront.”
— Hannah Peck, Neighbor at 21 Shoal Point Lane (greenwichfreepress.com)
What’s next
The Greenwich Planning & Zoning Commission will continue to review the application and await further feedback from the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) before making a decision.
The takeaway
This case highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing development and environmental preservation in coastal communities. Residents are concerned the proposed home would have a significant negative impact on the local ecosystem, increase flood risks, and disrupt the character of the Riverside neighborhood. The outcome could set an important precedent for future waterfront projects in the area.


