HUD Proposes Rule to Limit Public Housing for Noncitizens

The proposed rule would require all residents in HUD-funded housing to show proof of citizenship or eligible immigration status.

Published on Feb. 25, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has proposed a new rule that would limit public housing and other HUD-related housing assistance mostly to citizens. The rule would require all residents in HUD-funded housing, including those 62 years and older who previously only had to show proof of age, to provide proof of citizenship or eligible immigration status. Housing advocates fear the measure could lead to tens of thousands of people being evicted from their homes.

Why it matters

The proposed rule is part of the government's broader immigration crackdown and aims to bar mixed-status families, where some household members are eligible for assistance while others are not. Critics argue the measure would force many immigrant families to make the difficult choice between losing their housing assistance or separating their families.

The details

The rule, published in the Federal Register, would effectively bar mixed-status families from HUD-funded housing. A similar rule was proposed but never finalized during the Trump administration and is mentioned as a policy priority in the conservative blueprint Project 2025. HUD Secretary Scott Turner said the rule would "guarantee that all residents in HUD-funded housing are eligible tenants" and that the government has "zero tolerance for pushing aside hardworking U.S. citizens while enabling others to exploit decades-old loopholes."

  • The proposed rule will be made official when it's published in the Federal Register on Friday, February 20, 2026.
  • HUD did not specify how long it may take before the rule takes effect.

The players

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)

The federal agency that oversees public housing and other housing assistance programs.

Scott Turner

The current Secretary of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Shamus Roller

The executive director of the National Housing Law Project, a housing advocacy organization.

Sonya Acosta

A senior policy analyst with the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a left-leaning think tank.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Under President Trump's leadership, the days of illegal aliens, ineligibles, and fraudsters gaming the system and riding the coattails of American taxpayers are over. HUD's proposed rule will guarantee that all residents in HUD-funded housing are eligible tenants. We have zero tolerance for pushing aside hardworking U.S. citizens while enabling others to exploit decades-old loopholes.”

— Scott Turner, HUD Secretary (middletownpress.com)

“Our country can ensure that every one of us, no matter where we come from or what language we speak, has a safe home. Instead, Trump is trying to evict immigrant families, citizen and non-citizen, from HUD housing.”

— Shamus Roller, Executive Director, National Housing Law Project (middletownpress.com)

“Everyone deserves an affordable home, including our neighbors, friends, and coworkers who are immigrants. This rule would force 20,000 families with mixed immigration statuses to make the agonizing choice between losing the assistance that helps them pay rent every month or separating their family. People without a documented immigration status have never been eligible for rental assistance.”

— Sonya Acosta, Senior Policy Analyst, Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (middletownpress.com)

What’s next

The proposed rule will be published in the Federal Register on Friday, February 20, 2026, after which the public will have an opportunity to comment on it before it is finalized and implemented.

The takeaway

The HUD proposal to limit public housing assistance to citizens and eligible noncitizens is the latest in a series of immigration-related policies aimed at restricting access to government programs. While supporters argue it will ensure assistance goes to eligible recipients, critics warn it could force thousands of families to choose between their housing and their loved ones.