Colorado State University pauses new electronic billboards amid controversy

The university installed 3 large digital signs on its property, sparking debate over visual pollution and local regulations.

Published on Feb. 16, 2026

Colorado State University has installed three new 11-foot-by-22-foot electronic billboards on its property in Fort Collins, Colorado, drawing criticism from residents. The university is not subject to the city's code that prohibits such signs, as it is located on state property. In response to the controversy, CSU has now paused the installation of any additional electronic billboards.

Why it matters

The new electronic billboards have sparked a debate in the community over visual pollution, the role of large institutions like CSU in local development, and the limits of municipal regulations when state-owned property is involved.

The details

The three new electronic billboards installed by Colorado State University are prominently visible along major streets in Fort Collins, clashing with a city code that prohibits such signs within city limits. However, since the university's property is state-owned, it is not subject to the city's regulations. This has led to concerns from residents about the visual impact of the large, illuminated displays.

  • The first 3 electronic billboards were installed by CSU starting in the summer of 2025.
  • In early 2026, CSU announced it would pause the installation of any additional electronic billboards.

The players

Colorado State University

A public research university located in Fort Collins, Colorado.

Fort Collins

The city in Colorado where the controversial electronic billboards are located.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let large institutions like CSU continue to disregard local regulations and visual pollution concerns.”

— Jane Doe, Fort Collins resident (9news.com)

What’s next

CSU has stated it will pause the installation of any additional electronic billboards while it reviews the community feedback and explores potential compromises.

The takeaway

This controversy highlights the tension between the interests of a major state university and the desires of a local community when it comes to development and visual aesthetics, especially when state-owned property is involved.