Starfield's Future: A Cyberpunk-Style Renaissance?

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Despite its initial reception as a critical flop, Starfield's recent updates have reignited discussions about its potential for a cyberpunk-style renaissance. The game's vast, procedurally generated world and its unique challenges, as well as the limitations of its engine, are explored in this article.

Why it matters

Starfield's ambition to create a vast, procedurally generated world is admirable, but it's a square peg in a round hole. The game's design is inherently limited by its engine, and the only way forward is to put more stuff in while addressing the criticism of a lack of space simulation.

The details

Starfield, at its core, is a space life sim and questing RPG, a sci-fi twist on the Bethesda formula. The game's vastness, spread thinly across hundreds of planets, is both a strength and a weakness. The game's engine, the Creation Engine, is a cell-based system that treats every space as a separate room, compartmentalizing the entire game world. This design choice allows Bethesda to build huge worlds and fill them with intricate quests and interactive elements, but it also comes with a price. The engine is not designed for seamless world streaming, which is why Starfield struggles to simulate space effectively.

• The Free Lanes update was recently released in 2026.

What’s next

The article suggests that the only way forward for Starfield is to put more content into the game while addressing the criticism of a lack of space simulation. The game's engine limitations are a significant challenge that the developers will need to overcome.