Colorado Housing Advocates Granted New Chance in Illegal Search Case

Nonprofit group and resident allege police obtained overbroad warrants to access their electronic data.

Published on Feb. 24, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A Colorado woman and a nonprofit group that participated in a 2021 housing rights march in Colorado Springs were granted a second chance to sue the city and its police officers. The plaintiffs allege the officers obtained overbroad warrants to search and seize information stored on their electronic devices, violating their Fourth Amendment rights.

Why it matters

This case highlights the ongoing tension between law enforcement's need to investigate potential crimes and the constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. The court's decision allows the plaintiffs to continue challenging the scope of the warrants used by police, which could set an important precedent around digital privacy rights.

The details

The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ruled that the officers could not claim qualified immunity for obtaining warrants that allegedly allowed them to search for and seize information stored on the plaintiffs' electronic devices, though they were protected from liability for seizing the devices themselves. The court found the plaintiffs had plausibly alleged the warrants were unconstitutionally broad in scope.

  • The housing rights march took place in Colorado Springs in 2021.
  • The plaintiffs filed their lawsuit against the city and police officers in 2022.
  • The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its ruling on the case on February 24, 2026.

The players

Jacqueline Armendariz

A Colorado resident who participated in the 2021 housing rights march and is one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

Colorado Springs Police Department

The law enforcement agency whose officers obtained the allegedly overbroad warrants to search the plaintiffs' electronic devices.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The case will now return to the district court for further proceedings on the plaintiffs' claims against the city and police officers.

The takeaway

This ruling underscores the importance of carefully tailoring search warrants to the specific evidence being sought, especially when it comes to digital information stored on electronic devices. It also serves as a reminder that law enforcement cannot simply claim qualified immunity to avoid liability for alleged constitutional violations.