Republican-Led States Pass Bills to Shield Oil Companies from Climate Lawsuits

Coordinated effort linked to conservative activist Leonard Leo aims to block lawsuits over climate change costs

Apr. 11, 2026 at 2:55pm

A highly textured, abstract painting of an oil pump or well in overlapping, fractured geometric shapes in shades of grey, blue, and green, conveying a sense of motion and energy around the issue of climate change liability for the fossil fuel industry.The coordinated effort by conservative groups to shield oil and gas companies from climate change liability through state legislation is a complex and high-stakes battle over environmental accountability.Boulder Today

In a move that has sparked intense debate, Republican-led state legislatures are actively passing legislation to shield oil and gas companies from legal accountability for their role in climate change. This coordinated effort, linked to the influential conservative activist Leonard Leo, threatens to undermine long-standing legal mechanisms for holding corporations accountable.

Why it matters

With 15 laws either enacted or under consideration in 11 states, the stakes are high, as these bills aim to block ongoing and future lawsuits by states, counties, and municipalities seeking to hold fossil fuel companies accountable for the costs of climate-related disasters and environmental degradation. This push to shield oil and gas companies from climate change liability raises questions about the balance of power between state and federal institutions and the future of environmental accountability in the United States.

The details

The strategy behind these bills was laid bare during a panel discussion at the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) summit. Participants, including Will Hild and Oramel H. Skinner, presented pre-written legislation and funding, indicating a well-organized effort. Hild and Skinner's organizations, Consumers' Research and the Alliance for Consumers, are funded by entities connected to Leo, and they advocate for legal immunity for companies in climate-related cases. This aligns with Leo's broader mission to counter what he perceives as 'left-wing dominance' in various institutions.

  • In 2026, Republican-led state legislatures began passing bills to shield oil and gas companies from climate change lawsuits.
  • The strategy behind these bills was discussed at an American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) summit in 2026.

The players

Leonard Leo

An influential conservative activist who is linked to the coordinated effort to pass legislation shielding oil and gas companies from climate change lawsuits.

Will Hild

A participant in the ALEC summit panel discussion who presented pre-written legislation and funding for the bills aimed at providing legal immunity for oil and gas companies.

Oramel H. Skinner

A participant in the ALEC summit panel discussion who presented pre-written legislation and funding for the bills aimed at providing legal immunity for oil and gas companies.

Consumers' Research

An organization funded by entities connected to Leonard Leo that advocates for legal immunity for companies in climate-related cases.

Alliance for Consumers

An organization funded by entities connected to Leonard Leo that advocates for legal immunity for companies in climate-related cases.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”

— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident

“Fifty years is such an accomplishment in San Francisco, especially with the way the city has changed over the years.”

— Gordon Edgar, grocery employee

What’s next

The legal battles over these bills are intensifying, with high-profile cases like the one in Boulder, Colorado, where local governments are suing oil companies for environmental damage. The involvement of Leonard Leo's network, including lobbying firms and dark money groups, adds a layer of complexity to the issue. The introduction of similar bills in multiple states and the potential for state-by-state conflicts underscore the broader implications of this legal battle, which could ultimately be resolved by the Supreme Court or Congress.

The takeaway

The push to shield oil and gas companies from climate change liability is a significant development with far-reaching consequences. It raises questions about the balance of power between state and federal institutions and the future of environmental accountability in the United States, as the fossil fuel industry seeks to avoid legal responsibility for its role in contributing to climate change.