California City Loses Housing Battle Over Airport Noise

Watsonville's plan for 21 new townhomes near the municipal airport was blocked in court due to aviation safety concerns.

Published on Mar. 6, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The city of Watsonville, California approved a 21-unit housing development near the Watsonville Municipal Airport, but the Watsonville Pilots Association filed a lawsuit arguing the city violated state aviation safety laws by not updating its general plan to include Caltrans' guidelines for land use around airports. A judge agreed with the pilots association, halting the housing project and requiring the city to update its general plan before approving any new developments near the airport.

Why it matters

This case highlights the ongoing tension between residential development and airport operations in California, where noise and safety concerns from aviation groups often clash with the state's housing shortage. The ruling could set a precedent for other cities facing similar conflicts between airport interests and new housing proposals.

The details

The Watsonville Pilots Association sued the city after it approved the 21-unit Townhome Project, arguing the city violated state law by not incorporating Caltrans' Airport Land Use Planning Handbook into its general plan when considering developments near the airport. A judge agreed, ruling the city had 'no discretion' to rely on its own noise analysis instead of the state guidelines. The court ordered Watsonville to halt the housing project and update its general plan to comply with state aviation safety standards before approving any new developments near the airport.

  • In 2021, the Watsonville City Council approved the 21-unit Townhome Project near the municipal airport.
  • In 2021, the Watsonville Pilots Association filed a lawsuit against the city over the housing project approval.
  • On February 3, 2026, a judge ruled in favor of the pilots association, halting the housing project.

The players

Watsonville Pilots Association

An aviation group that filed a lawsuit against the city of Watsonville over its approval of a housing development near the municipal airport, arguing the city violated state law.

Watsonville Municipal Airport

A public airport located in Watsonville, California that has been the subject of ongoing conflicts between the city and local aviation interests over residential development near the airport.

Judge Timothy Schmal

The judge who ruled in favor of the Watsonville Pilots Association, determining the city violated state aviation safety law by approving the housing project without updating its general plan.

Orry Korb

A board member of the Watsonville Pilots Association who stated that noise can reduce airport operations or even lead to an airport's closure, and that residential development near airports creates a conflict.

Douglas Rice

The regional vice president of the California Pilots Association, who stated the court's decision will resonate at airports throughout the state that continue to ignore compliance with state safety standards.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Noise is always an issue. Residential development near airports is a conflict.”

— Orry Korb, Board Member, Watsonville Pilots Association (SFGATE)

“The essence of it was: You failed to follow precedent and amend your general plan. The city acknowledged that it was stuck until it could amend the general plan.”

— Orry Korb, Board Member, Watsonville Pilots Association (SFGATE)

“The court's decision will resonate at airports throughout the state which continue to ignore compliance with state safety standards.”

— Douglas Rice, Regional Vice President, California Pilots Association (SFGATE)

What’s next

The city of Watsonville is currently updating its planning guidelines around land use near the airport and expects to present a draft for its General Plan 2050 for public review later this year.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing challenges cities face in balancing residential development and airport operations, where noise, safety, and state regulations often clash. The ruling could set an important precedent for how California municipalities must approach planning around airports to comply with aviation safety laws.