- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Washington Today
By the People, for the People
New York Backs Away from Cap-and-Trade as West Coast States Merge Climate Programs
Concerns over energy costs prompt New York to halt plans for emissions trading system.
Apr. 2, 2026 at 9:28pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
As states grapple with the economic impacts of climate policies, the diverging approaches between New York and the West Coast highlight the complex tradeoffs involved in balancing environmental and financial priorities.Washington TodayWhile California and Washington state are preparing to merge their cap-and-trade programs to reduce emissions and generate revenue for climate action, New York has retreated from creating a similar program, sparking debates over the economic impacts of climate policies.
Why it matters
The diverging approaches between New York and the West Coast states highlight the challenges of balancing climate goals with economic concerns. New York's decision not to implement a cap-and-trade system raises questions about how it will meet its own emissions reduction targets without putting additional financial burdens on businesses and residents.
The details
After years of work, California and Washington are poised to combine their cap-and-trade programs, which set limits on carbon dioxide emissions and charge businesses per ton. In contrast, New York has backed away from creating a similar program, citing concerns over the costs to consumers and the economy.
- California and Washington have been developing their cap-and-trade programs for years.
- The states are now preparing to merge their programs in the near future.
The players
California
A state on the West Coast that has implemented a cap-and-trade program to reduce emissions and generate revenue for climate action.
Washington
A state on the West Coast that has also implemented a cap-and-trade program, and is now preparing to merge it with California's.
New York
A state on the East Coast that has decided not to create a cap-and-trade program, citing concerns over energy costs and the economy.
The takeaway
The diverging approaches between New York and the West Coast states on cap-and-trade programs highlight the ongoing challenges of balancing climate action with economic concerns. As states work to meet emissions reduction goals, policymakers must carefully weigh the costs and benefits of different climate policies.

