- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Motivation Isn't Enough to Drive Change
Understanding motivation: Behavior rarely fails because people don't care. It fails because the system quietly makes the right behavior too hard to perform.
Mar. 16, 2026 at 1:08pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
After a career in construction and a focus on sustainability, Darren Evans shares insights into motivation, intent, and meaningful change, closely linked to behavioral science. He argues that in complex, high-stakes environments like the construction industry, behavior rarely fails because people don't care, but because the system makes the right behavior too hard to perform. Motivation collapses under pressure, and ability, not just motivation, is key to driving real change.
Why it matters
This article provides a behavioral science perspective on why sustainability initiatives often struggle to gain traction, even when people are highly motivated. It highlights the importance of designing systems and processes that make the desired behaviors easier to perform, rather than relying solely on increasing motivation.
The details
Darren Evans draws on the Fogg Behavior Model, which states that behavior happens when motivation, ability, and a prompt converge. When ability drops, motivation becomes irrelevant. Ability is about how easy a behavior is to perform in the moment, given time constraints, uncertainty, and competing demands. Cognitive load is the hidden risk, as systems routinely overload people's brains with multiple standards, conflicting guidance, and ambiguous accountability. More information adds cognitive load but does not increase ability. Ability-first design asks different questions, such as what decisions can be removed or automated, what can be made default, and what needs to happen earlier when capacity is higher.
- The article was published on March 16, 2026.
The players
Darren Evans
A construction industry veteran who has focused on sustainability and sustainable buildings, and has insights into motivation, intent, and meaningful change, closely linked to behavioral science.
BJ Fogg
A Stanford professor whose Behavior Model is highly relevant to the article's discussion of motivation and ability.
Susan Michie
A researcher whose COM-B model places capability at the center of behavior change.
What’s next
The article does not mention any specific next steps, as it is focused on providing a broader perspective on the challenges of driving change through motivation alone.
The takeaway
This article highlights the importance of designing systems and processes that make the desired behaviors easier to perform, rather than relying solely on increasing motivation. By addressing cognitive load and making the right behaviors the default or routine, sustainability initiatives are more likely to succeed in complex, high-stakes environments like the construction industry.





