- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Appellate Court Upholds Measure P, Affirming Independent Oversight of Sonoma County Sheriff
Ruling clears path for full implementation of voter-approved police accountability measures
Apr. 3, 2026 at 7:04am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The appellate court's unambiguous ruling on Measure P compels local leaders to uphold the public's demand for independent oversight of law enforcement.Santa Rosa TodayThe appellate court has unequivocally upheld Measure P, a 2020 ballot measure that established an Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach with full subpoena authority to provide oversight of the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office. The ruling rejects arguments that the measure was flawed or legally unsound, and confirms the county must now move forward with full implementation to honor the will of voters.
Why it matters
The court decision ends a long-running debate over Measure P and clears the way for real, independent oversight of the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office as demanded by 64.7% of voters in 2020. This represents a major victory for police accountability advocates and sets an important precedent for how local governments must respect the will of the electorate on issues of law enforcement oversight.
The details
The appellate court ruling unambiguously upholds Measure P, rejecting arguments that the measure was legally flawed or that its subpoena powers could be limited by local officials. The court affirmed the Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach has full authority to provide oversight, including the ability to compel testimony and documents from the sheriff as an elected official. This overturns previous attempts to delay or narrow the implementation of Measure P through administrative actions or labor agreements.
- In 2020, 64.7% of Sonoma County voters approved Measure P to establish independent oversight of the Sheriff's Office.
- On March 28, 2026, the appellate court issued its ruling upholding Measure P in full.
The players
Measure P
A 2020 ballot measure approved by 64.7% of Sonoma County voters that established an Independent Office of Law Enforcement Review and Outreach with full subpoena authority to provide oversight of the Sonoma County Sheriff's Office.
Sonoma County Board of Supervisors
The county governing body now has the authority and responsibility to ensure full implementation of the voter-approved Measure P.
What they’re saying
“The appellate court decision on Measure P should end any remaining debate ('Court rules in watchdog group's favor,' March 28). Sonoma County voters were clear in 2020 — 64.7% supported real, independent oversight of the Sheriff's Office — and the court affirmed that mandate in full.”
— Barbara Grasseschi, Healdsburg resident
What’s next
The Sonoma County Board of Supervisors must now align county policy with the law and honor the will of the voters by ensuring full implementation of the independent oversight measures approved through Measure P.
The takeaway
This court ruling represents a significant victory for police accountability advocates in Sonoma County, affirming the public's demand for real, independent oversight of the Sheriff's Office. It sets an important precedent that local governments must respect the will of voters on issues of law enforcement oversight, even in the face of resistance from elected officials.

