- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Readers Debate Santa Rosa Transit and Road Diets
Letters to the Editor discuss SMART train funding, downtown revitalization, and the impacts of road diets on traffic flow.
Published on Mar. 9, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Readers of the Press Democrat in Santa Rosa, California wrote letters to the editor on a range of local issues, including complaints about the SMART train sales tax, efforts to reunify downtown Santa Rosa, and concerns over "road diets" that have reduced lanes on some city streets. The letters touch on themes of public transit, urban planning, and the role of government regulation in the economy.
Why it matters
These letters provide a window into the ongoing debates within the Santa Rosa community around infrastructure investments, downtown development, and traffic management. They highlight tensions between those who support public transit and walkable urban design versus those who prioritize automobile access and traffic flow. The letters also reflect broader discussions around the role of government, regulation, and the tradeoffs between individual liberty and collective wellbeing.
The details
The letters cover several key issues facing Santa Rosa. One letter criticizes affluent residents for opposing a sales tax that helps fund the SMART commuter rail system, arguing that public services must be funded. Another letter applauds efforts to reintegrate the city's divided downtown, opposing a proposal to add more vehicle traffic. A third letter traces the history of financial deregulation in the U.S., arguing that it has led to increased greed and risk-taking. Finally, a letter complains that "road diets" - reducing lanes for cars - are causing gridlock in some Santa Rosa neighborhoods.
- The letters were published on March 9, 2026.
The players
John Trubee
A Santa Rosa resident who depends on the SMART train and argues that public services must be funded.
Hugh Helm
A Santa Rosa resident who supports efforts to reunify the city's divided downtown.
Tom Fantulin
A Fort Bragg resident who traces the history of financial deregulation and its impacts.
Mary Tenwinkel
A Santa Rosa resident who opposes "road diets" that have reduced lanes on city streets.
What they’re saying
“Public services improve our quality of life and must be funded. Should we refuse to pay our household electric and water bills because they are 'liabilities' on some dubious ledger in some ideologue's imagination?”
— John Trubee (Press Democrat)
“Santa Rosa's one-thriving downtown was the heart of our community, and I hope the good people of Sata Rosa will unify and bring it back.”
— Hugh Helm (Press Democrat)
“Recently, American Psychiatric Association studies have shown that speculative investing and stock trading can trigger a psychochemical response similar to greed.”
— Tom Fantulin (Press Democrat)
The takeaway
These letters highlight the ongoing tensions and debates within the Santa Rosa community around issues of public transit, urban planning, and financial regulation. They reflect broader societal discussions around the role of government, the tradeoffs between individual and collective interests, and the impacts of economic policies on local communities.
