Seahawks QB Darnold Hit With $20K California Tax Bill After Super Bowl Win

Jock tax rules require out-of-state players to pay state income taxes based on 'duty days' in California.

Feb. 10, 2026 at 6:55pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Seattle Seahawks quarterback Sam Darnold earned a $178,000 bonus for winning Super Bowl LX, but due to California's high state income tax rate of 13.3% and the 'jock tax' rule, he ended up owing the state nearly $198,000 in taxes - more than the bonus itself. The jock tax requires professional athletes to pay state income taxes in every jurisdiction where they work, with taxes calculated based on 'duty days' that include practices, meetings, media obligations, and travel days.

Why it matters

The situation highlights how the jock tax system can significantly impact out-of-state players who compete in high-tax states like California, even when they are only there for a short period of time for a major event like the Super Bowl. This has renewed debate over whether the NFL should adjust championship compensation when games are held in high-tax jurisdictions.

The details

Darnold's $178,000 Super Bowl bonus was subject to California's 13.3% state income tax rate, which resulted in a tax bill of nearly $198,000 - more than the bonus itself. This is because the jock tax rules reallocate a portion of Darnold's entire season salary to California based on his 'duty days' spent in the state, not just the bonus amount.

  • The Super Bowl LX was played on February 8, 2026 at Levi's Stadium in Santa Clara, California.

The players

Sam Darnold

The quarterback for the Seattle Seahawks who led his team to victory in Super Bowl LX.

California

The state that has the highest state income tax rate in the country at 13.3%, which resulted in a significant tax bill for Darnold due to the 'jock tax' rules.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The NFL may consider adjusting championship compensation when future Super Bowls are held in high-tax states like California to help offset the significant tax burden on out-of-state players.

The takeaway

The 'jock tax' rules can have a major financial impact on professional athletes, especially those who compete in high-tax states like California even for a short period of time like the Super Bowl. This case highlights the need for potential reforms to the jock tax system to ensure players are not unfairly penalized for their success.