- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
District Attorney Calls for Mental Health Diversion Law Reform
AB 46 aims to strengthen California's mental health diversion statute and restore judicial discretion
Mar. 16, 2026 at 7:34pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The Santa Barbara County District Attorney's Office is joining the California District Attorneys Association in urging the California Legislature to pass Assembly Bill 46, which would close significant legal loopholes in California's mental health diversion statute. The bill aims to restore judicial discretion and ensure diversion programs can provide treatment while still protecting public safety.
Why it matters
Recent court rulings and statutory limitations have significantly restricted judges' ability to deny mental health diversion, even in serious and violent cases, limiting courts' ability to determine whether diversion is truly appropriate. Across California, there have been tragic examples of individuals granted diversion later committing violent crimes, including murder, attempted murder, sexual assault, and domestic violence.
The details
AB 46 would allow courts to consider whether a defendant poses a substantial and undue risk to the physical safety of another person and whether the proposed treatment plan is clinically appropriate to address the mental health condition that contributed to the crime. The current law allows defendants charged with serious and violent offenses to qualify for mental health diversion, and once a defendant presents evidence of a qualifying condition, diversion is often presumed, leaving courts with limited ability to filter out cases where the underlying conduct involves significant violence or risk to public safety.
- AB 46 will be heard in the Senate Public Safety Committee on March 17, 2026.
The players
John T. Savrnoch
The Santa Barbara County District Attorney, who emphasized that diversion can be an important tool when used appropriately, but the current law has limited judges' ability to consider public safety when making these decisions.
Assembly Bill 46
Legislation sponsored by the Sacramento County District Attorney's Office and co-sponsored by district attorneys across the state, including the Santa Barbara County District Attorney's Office, which aims to strengthen California's mental health diversion statute.
What’s next
AB 46 will be heard in the Senate Public Safety Committee on March 17, 2026.
The takeaway
This case highlights the need to reform California's mental health diversion law to restore judicial discretion and ensure diversion programs can provide treatment while still protecting public safety, especially in cases involving serious and violent crimes.


