White House Cyber Strategy Draws Private Sector Deeper Into Offensive Debate

Cybersecurity leaders weigh legal and ethical concerns as government seeks to enlist companies in hacking back against adversaries.

Apr. 10, 2026 at 4:22pm by

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A complex, glowing network of interconnected cybersecurity infrastructure, with pulsing neon lights representing the high-stakes, high-tech nature of the offensive cyber debate.As the government seeks to enlist private companies in offensive cyber operations, the debate over the legal and ethical boundaries of this new digital battlefront remains unresolved.San Francisco Today

The U.S. government is expanding the market for offensive cyber capabilities and drawing more of the private sector into that ecosystem, even as policy boundaries around their use remain unclear. Industry executives and former officials indicate it's an open question where companies draw the line on cyber offense and where the government does, with the boundaries often blurred. This uncertainty leaves more questions than answers about how offensive cyber operations should be structured, regulated, and integrated into a broader national security strategy.

Why it matters

As foreign adversaries continue to develop sophisticated hacking tools, the U.S. government is seeking to leverage private sector expertise and capabilities to counter these threats. However, the legal and ethical concerns around offensive cyber operations remain a major point of contention, with the private sector wary of being deployed for hacking activities. This debate highlights the need for clearer policy frameworks to govern the use of offensive cyber capabilities and the role of the private sector in national security.

The details

The White House's new national cyber strategy focuses on ways to create obstacles for foreign state cyber operatives and criminal hackers. This has drawn more of the private sector into the ecosystem of offensive cyber capabilities, with industry executives and former officials indicating it's an open question where companies draw the line on cyber offense and where the government does. Terms like 'disruption,' 'cyber effects,' and 'defensive operations' have been discussed, but the boundaries around offensive cyber are often blurred. The private sector is still trying to learn its place, with concerns about legal and ethical issues. There are also questions about how offensive cyber operations should be structured, regulated, and integrated into a broader national security strategy.

  • The White House released its new national cyber strategy in early 2026.
  • The RSAC Conference in San Francisco, one of the largest cybersecurity gatherings, was held last month.

The players

Sean Cairncross

National Cyber Director, who stated that the government wants to use the 'ability of our private sector ... to inform and share information so that the [U.S. government] can respond' to cyber threats, but is not talking about the private sector engaging in offensive cyber campaigns.

Rob Joyce

The former NSA cybersecurity director who is now a venture partner at DataTribe, which invests in early-stage cybersecurity companies often led by people who worked in the intelligence community.

Adam Marrè

Chief Information Security Officer at Arctic Wolf, who said the private sector does not want to be deployed for offensive hacking due to legal and ethical concerns.

Elad Schulman

CEO of Lasso Security, who stated that if the U.S. is not developing offensive cyber capabilities, its enemies will, and that is why the assumption is that exploits will be used against the U.S. at any point in time.

Ryan Anschutz

The incident response lead at IBM's X-Force threat intelligence arm and a former FBI official, who advised the cyber ecosystem to invest in defensive measures rather than offensive capabilities.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“There's been companies that are defense industrial base firms that know how to sell to the government, and there's been some very boutique cyber companies that sell into the military cyber and intel community. But this has the whole community and people out here in Silicon Valley who are not government-adjacent talking about ideas that they can help with in offensive cyber. I think it changes that ecosystem a little bit.”

— Rob Joyce, Former NSA Cybersecurity Director

“Being a defender, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. A defensive prevention perspective, I think, would have more of an impact … than offensive capabilities, which, quite frankly, some arms of the federal government — their offensive capabilities far surpass the private sector.”

— Ryan Anschutz, Incident Response Lead, IBM X-Force

“If we are not developing capabilities, our enemies are developing those capabilities. That is why we need to assume that, at any point in time, someone will find and use exploits against us.”

— Elad Schulman, CEO, Lasso Security

What’s next

The Biden administration will need to provide clearer policy guidance and legal frameworks to govern the use of offensive cyber capabilities and the role of the private sector in national security. This will involve discussions around issues such as 'stand-your-ground' laws that could permit companies to respond to cyber intrusions to a certain degree.

The takeaway

The White House's push to counter hackers through offensive cyber operations has drawn the private sector deeper into a complex debate with no clear boundaries. While the government seeks to leverage private sector expertise, companies remain wary of the legal and ethical concerns around hacking activities. Resolving this tension will require policymakers to establish clearer guidelines and legal frameworks to govern the use of offensive cyber capabilities and the private sector's role in national security.