Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Birthright Citizenship

Ending birthright citizenship would let the government decide who counts as American based on the circumstances of their birth.

Mar. 31, 2026 at 8:03pm by Ben Kaplan

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A photorealistic painting of a grand government building or courthouse in a warm, golden light, with deep shadows casting across the facade, conveying a sense of quiet contemplation and the weight of the legal decision at hand.As the Supreme Court weighs the future of birthright citizenship, the stakes extend far beyond immigration policy to the very foundations of American democracy.San Francisco Today

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on April 1 challenging President Donald Trump's executive order to end birthright citizenship for children of undocumented parents. The case seeks to undo the 14th Amendment's guarantee of citizenship for anyone born on U.S. soil, which was designed to dismantle a system that denied Black people's humanity and political voice.

Why it matters

Defending birthright citizenship is not only about protecting children of immigrants, but about preserving a constitutional framework that recognizes our shared humanity and limits the government's ability to decide whose rights matter. If the court strikes down birthright citizenship, it would let the government decide who counts as American based on the circumstances of their birth, affecting everyone - not just children of immigrants - in a system that has long questioned the belonging of people of color.

The details

The 14th Amendment was ratified in 1868 to overturn the Dred Scott v. Sandford decision, which declared that Black people 'had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.' Birthright citizenship was meant to be simple and permanent so no government could take it away based on race, ancestry, or political whim. The Supreme Court reaffirmed this principle in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, ruling that a man born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents was a citizen despite Chinese immigrants being barred from naturalization at the time.

  • The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on April 1, 2026.
  • President Donald Trump issued an executive order to end birthright citizenship on the first day of his second term.

The players

Donald Trump

The former president who issued an executive order to end birthright citizenship.

United States v. Wong Kim Ark

A Supreme Court case that ruled a man born in San Francisco to Chinese immigrant parents was a U.S. citizen, establishing that U.S.-born children of immigrants are citizens.

Dred Scott v. Sandford

A Supreme Court case that declared Black people 'had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.'

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Birthright citizenship was never an abstract ideal. It was a response to America's long history of dehumanization—a past that Trump and his MAGA allies are now openly trying to resurrect.”

— Damareo Cooper, Racial justice organizer and author

“If the government can redefine citizenship, unequal treatment under the law becomes easier to justify. Civil rights become conditional. Equal protection becomes negotiable. State power expands while accountability shrinks.”

— Damareo Cooper, Racial justice organizer and author

What’s next

The Supreme Court will decide whether to uphold or strike down birthright citizenship during the oral arguments on April 1, 2026.

The takeaway

Defending birthright citizenship is not just about protecting children of immigrants, but about preserving a constitutional framework that recognizes our shared humanity and limits the government's ability to decide whose rights matter. If the Supreme Court strikes down this fundamental principle, it would have far-reaching consequences for civil rights and equal protection under the law.