FBI Shares Unverified Tip About Potential Iranian Drone Threat Off California Coast

White House quickly dismisses the alert as false information, saying no such threat exists

Mar. 13, 2026 at 9:23am by Ben Kaplan

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The FBI distributed an advisory to California law enforcement agencies referencing unverified intelligence that Iran had 'aspired' to launch unmanned aerial systems from a vessel off the California coast. However, the White House swiftly criticized the reporting as false, stating that no such threat from Iran to the U.S. homeland ever existed.

Why it matters

The advisory highlights the challenges in balancing security precautions with avoiding unnecessary public alarm, especially during periods of heightened geopolitical tensions. It also underscores the proliferation of drone technology and the ongoing efforts by authorities to monitor potential threats to critical infrastructure and population centers.

The details

The FBI advisory, shared through federal security channels, did not identify specific targets, dates or operational details, only stating that Iran had 'aspired' to conduct a surprise attack using drones from an unspecified vessel. Local officials confirmed they were coordinating with federal partners but emphasized there was no indication of a specific or imminent threat. After the advisory became public, the White House Press Secretary sharply criticized the reporting as false, stating that the threat 'never did' exist.

  • The FBI advisory was distributed in early March 2026.
  • The White House response criticizing the reporting occurred just hours after the advisory became public.

The players

FBI

The Federal Bureau of Investigation, which distributed the advisory about the unverified Iranian drone threat.

Karoline Leavitt

The White House Press Secretary who strongly dismissed the reporting about the FBI advisory as false information.

Gavin Newsom

The Governor of California who said there was no verified threat to the state and that officials remained in communication with federal authorities as a precaution.

Tom Warrick

A former Department of Homeland Security official who explained that such advisories often stem from intercepted communications about aspirational attack concepts rather than operational planning.

Michael Eisenstadt

An Iran specialist and senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy who said the concept referenced in the alert is not entirely imaginary, though executing such an operation would be complex for Iran.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This post and story should be immediately retracted by ABC News for providing false information to intentionally alarm the American people.”

— Karoline Leavitt, White House Press Secretary

“When you see the word 'unverified,' that generally means this is aspirational.”

— Tom Warrick, Former Department of Homeland Security official

“To get it across the globe and close enough off the coast of California to make a difference — I'm pretty sure we track pretty closely ships coming out of Iran. That would likely be a little too complicated for them to do at this point.”

— Michael Eisenstadt, Iran specialist and senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy

What’s next

The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.

The takeaway

This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.