- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
San Francisco Moves to Break from PG&E for Power
State bill aims to streamline city's path to public utility ownership amid reliability concerns
Published on Feb. 24, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
San Francisco is escalating efforts to sever its longstanding relationship with Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) and transition to a publicly-owned utility system, following a series of widespread power outages that left hundreds of thousands of residents without electricity. State Senator Scott Wiener introduced Senate Bill 875 to remove legal obstacles that have historically hindered cities seeking to acquire their utility infrastructure from PG&E.
Why it matters
The push for a publicly-owned utility is fueled by comparisons to other Californian cities with municipal utilities that offer significantly lower rates, despite what San Francisco officials describe as inadequate infrastructure maintenance and service from PG&E. The prospect of lower costs is a key driver, as residents face consistently high electricity bills.
The details
SB 875 seeks to streamline the process for cities like San Francisco to pursue a public acquisition of their utility services. Currently, the process is complicated by legal challenges and lobbying efforts from PG&E. The bill aims to create a more equitable framework for potential takeovers, addressing what Wiener described as a need to 'unrig' the existing process. The legislation does not mandate a public takeover, but rather facilitates a fairer process should the city choose to pursue one through eminent domain.
- State Senator Scott Wiener introduced Senate Bill 875 on Monday, February 23, 2026.
- The bill is expected to be heard by the state senate committee around March – April of this year.
- Prior to that, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors is scheduled to present a resolution supporting SB 875.
The players
Scott Wiener
A California state senator who introduced Senate Bill 875 to remove legal obstacles for cities seeking to acquire utility infrastructure from PG&E.
Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E)
A private utility company that has provided electricity and natural gas services to San Francisco for decades, but has faced criticism over reliability issues and safety concerns.
San Francisco Board of Supervisors
The legislative body of the City and County of San Francisco, which is scheduled to present a resolution supporting SB 875.
What’s next
The bill is expected to be heard by the state senate committee around March – April of this year. Prior to that, the San Francisco Board of Supervisors is scheduled to present a resolution supporting SB 875.
The takeaway
This effort to transition San Francisco to a publicly-owned utility system is driven by reliability issues, high electricity costs, and a desire for more local control over essential infrastructure. If successful, it could serve as a model for other municipalities grappling with similar challenges with investor-owned utilities.
San Francisco top stories
San Francisco events
Mar. 9, 2026
Cash Cobain - MOVED TO AUGUST HALL 3/9/26Mar. 9, 2026
Cash CobainMar. 10, 2026
Golden State Warriors vs. Chicago Bulls




