San Francisco Sued Over Controversial Reparations Plan

Taxpayers challenge city's plan to pay $5 million to eligible Black residents.

Feb. 5, 2026 at 8:31pm by Ben Kaplan

Two San Francisco taxpayers, along with a conservative advocacy group, have filed a lawsuit against the city over its controversial reparations plan that would provide cash payments and other benefits to Black residents. The plaintiffs argue the plan is unconstitutional and amounts to a "racial spoils system." The city says it will review the complaint and respond in court.

Why it matters

The reparations plan has sparked fierce debate, with supporters arguing it's needed to address historic discrimination against Black San Franciscans, while critics call it illegal and a waste of taxpayer money. The lawsuit could determine whether the city can legally implement the program.

The details

The reparations plan, signed into law in December 2025, would provide eligible Black residents with $5 million cash payments, debt forgiveness, 250 years of tax abatements, and income subsidies. However, the city has admitted it lacks the funds to fully finance the program due to a projected $936 million budget deficit. The plaintiffs, including the Californians for Equal Rights Foundation, argue the plan imposes illegal "racial classifications" on residents.

  • The reparations plan was signed into law by Mayor Daniel Lurie in December 2025.
  • The lawsuit was filed by the plaintiffs on February 6, 2026.

The players

Richie Greenberg

A San Francisco activist and one of the plaintiffs suing the city over the reparations plan.

Arthur Ritchie

A San Francisco resident and one of the plaintiffs suing the city over the reparations plan.

Californians for Equal Rights Foundation

A conservative advocacy group that is a plaintiff in the lawsuit against San Francisco's reparations plan.

Daniel Lurie

The mayor of San Francisco who signed the reparations plan into law in December 2025.

Shamann Walton

The San Francisco Supervisor who introduced the reparations bill last year.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Though presented as a response to slavery, San Francisoc's plan will impose sweeping racial classifications on present-day residents who neither endured enslavement nor inflicted it.”

— Richie Greenberg, Plaintiff

“Once we are served, we will review the complaint and respond in court.”

— Jen Kwart, Spokesperson for San Francisco City Attorney

“They have put rhetoric and ideology ahead of the city's residents.”

— Richie Greenberg, Plaintiff

What’s next

The judge will review the lawsuit and determine whether the city's reparations plan can legally move forward.

The takeaway

San Francisco's ambitious reparations plan has sparked a fierce legal battle, with critics arguing it's unconstitutional and a misuse of taxpayer funds. The outcome of this lawsuit could set a precedent for similar reparations efforts across the country.