- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Robbins Geller Files Class Action Lawsuit Against NuScale Power
Lawsuit alleges NuScale misled investors about its commercialization partner's experience
Published on Mar. 8, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The law firm of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP has filed a class action lawsuit against NuScale Power Corporation (NYSE: SMR) on behalf of investors who purchased NuScale Class A common stock between May 13, 2025 and November 6, 2025. The lawsuit alleges that NuScale and its executives made false and misleading statements about its commercialization partner ENTRA1 Energy LLC, which lacked significant experience in the nuclear power industry.
Why it matters
This lawsuit highlights the risks investors face when companies make exaggerated claims about their business partnerships and growth prospects. The allegations raise concerns about NuScale's ability to successfully commercialize its small modular nuclear reactor technology and the due diligence it conducted on its key commercialization partner.
The details
The lawsuit alleges that NuScale claimed ENTRA1 would allow it to take its nuclear reactor technology from development to deployment, but ENTRA1 had never built, financed, or operated any significant projects in the nuclear power industry. The lawsuit further alleges that NuScale's payments to ENTRA1 for a deal with the Tennessee Valley Authority ballooned its general and administrative expenses by over 3,000% in Q3 2025, leading to a massive $532 million quarterly net loss.
- The class period covers purchases of NuScale Class A common stock between May 13, 2025 and November 6, 2025.
- Investors have until April 20, 2026 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the lawsuit.
The players
Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
A leading law firm representing investors in securities fraud and shareholder rights litigation.
NuScale Power Corporation
A company developing small modular nuclear reactor technology.
ENTRA1 Energy LLC
NuScale's commercialization partner that allegedly lacked significant experience in the nuclear power industry.
John L. Hopkins
CEO of NuScale Power Corporation.
Fluor Corporation
A company charged in the lawsuit along with NuScale and its executives.
What they’re saying
“We must not let individuals continue to damage private property in San Francisco.”
— Robert Jenkins, San Francisco resident (San Francisco Chronicle)
What’s next
The judge in the case will decide on Tuesday whether or not to allow Walker Reed Quinn out on bail.
The takeaway
This case highlights growing concerns in the community about repeat offenders released on bail, raising questions about bail reform, public safety on SF streets, and if any special laws to govern autonomous vehicles in residential and commercial areas.
San Diego top stories
San Diego events
Mar. 9, 2026
Nine Inch Nails - Peel It Back Tour 2026Mar. 10, 2026
Monster Energy Outbreak Presents: Joey Valence & BraeMar. 12, 2026
Elefante: Tour 30 Aniversario




