US Supreme Court Declines to Hear Huntington Beach's Housing Battle Against California

City leaders now face state and court mandates to develop a housing plan immediately after the high court refused to take up the case.

Published on Feb. 23, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear Huntington Beach's case challenging the state's requirement for the city to develop a new housing plan, leaving the city's lawsuit against California dead. With the high court's decision, Huntington Beach must now comply with state and court orders to approve a housing plan, or face further legal action from the state.

Why it matters

Huntington Beach has been fighting the state's housing mandates for years, arguing that as a charter city, it should not be compelled to follow state housing laws. The Supreme Court's refusal to hear the case marks a major defeat for the city and affirms the state's authority to require local governments to plan for new housing development.

The details

Huntington Beach has lost multiple lawsuits against the state over housing requirements since March 2023. With the Supreme Court declining to take up the case, the city's last legal avenue has been exhausted. State and local courts have ordered Huntington Beach to approve a new housing plan, but the city council has not yet had any public discussions on doing so.

  • In March 2023, Huntington Beach began its legal battle against the state's housing mandates.
  • In 2025, the California Supreme Court declined to hear Huntington Beach's case against the state.
  • In early 2026, a San Diego Superior Court judge ordered Huntington Beach to adopt a new housing plan by Spring 2026.
  • On February 23, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Huntington Beach's case against the state.

The players

Gavin Newsom

The Governor of California, who praised the Supreme Court's decision not to hear Huntington Beach's case.

Rob Bonta

The California Attorney General, who also praised the Supreme Court's decision and said the state looks forward to holding Huntington Beach accountable in state court.

Casey McKeon

The Mayor of Huntington Beach, who did not respond to requests for comment on the Supreme Court's decision.

Katherine Bacal

A San Diego Superior Court judge who ordered Huntington Beach to adopt a new housing plan by Spring 2026.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Huntington Beach took its fight to the highest court in the country — and lost.”

— Rob Bonta, California Attorney General (voiceofoc.org)

“After years of meritless resistance that has wasted taxpayer dollars, Huntington Beach can no longer claim that the U.S. Constitution is on its side.”

— Rob Bonta, California Attorney General (voiceofoc.org)

“The Huntington Beach officials who wasted taxpayer dollars on this embarrassing approach rather than doing their jobs ought to be ashamed of themselves.”

— Gavin Newsom, Governor of California (voiceofoc.org)

What’s next

Until Huntington Beach approves a new housing plan that is accepted by state regulators, the city will be limited in its ability to use zoning powers to control new housing development.

The takeaway

The Supreme Court's refusal to hear Huntington Beach's case marks a major defeat for the city in its long-running battle against state housing mandates. With no further legal options, Huntington Beach must now comply with state and court orders to develop a new housing plan, or face further legal consequences from the state.