Fallbrook Couple Clash with State Over Citrus Tree Removal

Homeowners say California agriculture officials threatened arrest over infected trees on their private property.

Jan. 30, 2026 at 8:31pm

A Fallbrook, California couple, Phil and Elizabeth Rupprecht, say state agriculture employees entered their private property without permission, threatened to arrest the homeowner, and demanded the removal of the couple's citrus trees after one was found infected with a disease that kills fruit crops. The Rupprechts say they were given three options: allow chemical spraying, destroy the trees themselves, or face arrest, and they chose to cut down the trees at their own cost to avoid the spraying and potential arrest.

Why it matters

This case highlights the tension between state efforts to protect agricultural crops from devastating diseases and pests, and the rights of private property owners. The Rupprechts' experience raises concerns about government overreach and the extent to which officials can intervene on private land, even when tests show no infection on that property.

The details

According to the Rupprechts, state agriculture inspectors found one of their citrus trees infected with the Asian citrus psyllid bug and a disease that kills fruit trees on a neighboring property more than a year ago. Despite their own trees testing negative, the inspectors demanded the Rupprechts allow chemical spraying of their property or face arrest if they refused. The couple chose to cut down 10 of their own fruit trees, some nearly 30 years old, to avoid the spraying and potential arrest.

  • More than a year ago, state agriculture inspectors found an infected tree on a neighboring property.
  • The Rupprechts say state employees entered their property without permission to test their trees.

The players

Phil and Elizabeth Rupprecht

A Fallbrook, California couple who own the private property in question.

California Department of Agriculture

The state agency responsible for protecting agricultural crops from pests and diseases, which sent inspectors to the Rupprechts' property.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“It's very disconcerting to come home and find someone on your property.”

— Elizabeth Rupprecht (nbcsandiego.com)

“I felt invaded. It's our Fourth Amendment going to, you know, going to pot.”

— Phil Rupprecht (nbcsandiego.com)

What’s next

The Rupprechts say state agriculture employees later returned with California Highway Patrol officers to inspect their property again, raising further concerns about government overreach.

The takeaway

This case highlights the delicate balance between protecting agricultural interests and respecting private property rights. It underscores the need for state agencies to work collaboratively with homeowners to find solutions that address pest and disease concerns without resorting to heavy-handed tactics that violate constitutional protections.