- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Judge Blocks California from Enforcing ICE Mask Ban
Federal judge rules state law unlawfully discriminates against federal law enforcement officers.
Published on Feb. 9, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
A federal judge has blocked California from enforcing a law that prohibited federal immigration enforcement agents from wearing masks while operating in the state. The judge ruled that the 'No Secret Police Act' unlawfully discriminates against federal law enforcement officers, violating the U.S. Constitution's supremacy clause. However, the judge declined to block a separate law, the 'No Vigilantes Act,' which requires ICE, Border Patrol and Homeland Security agents to clearly identify themselves.
Why it matters
The ruling is a victory for the Trump administration, which had challenged the California law. It highlights the ongoing tensions between state and federal authorities over immigration enforcement policies. The case also touches on broader debates around police transparency and accountability.
The details
In her ruling, Judge Christina Snyder of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted a preliminary injunction against part of the 'No Secret Police Act.' The judge wrote that the law unlawfully discriminates against federal law enforcement officers. However, Snyder also ruled that the Trump administration failed to show that a ban on facial coverings is a direct regulation of the federal government, stating that 'federal officers can perform their federal functions without wearing masks.'
- The 'No Secret Police Act' was passed by California lawmakers and signed into law by Gov. Gavin Newsom last year.
- Judge Snyder issued her ruling on Monday, February 9, 2026.
The players
Judge Christina Snyder
A federal judge for the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California who granted a preliminary injunction against part of California's 'No Secret Police Act.'
President Donald Trump
The former U.S. president whose administration brought the case challenging the California law.
Gov. Gavin Newsom
The governor of California who signed the 'No Secret Police Act' into law last year.
What they’re saying
“California cannot stop federal law enforcement officers from wearing masks.”
— Judge Christina Snyder, U.S. District Court Judge
What’s next
The case may continue to be litigated, with the possibility of an appeal by either side. The long-term impact of the ruling on federal-state tensions over immigration enforcement remains to be seen.
The takeaway
This ruling highlights the ongoing legal and political battles between California and the federal government over immigration policies. It demonstrates the complexities involved when state and federal authorities have conflicting approaches to law enforcement and transparency.
Sacramento top stories
Sacramento events
Mar. 9, 2026
An Evening with Michael PollanMar. 10, 2026
Sacramento Kings vs. Indiana PacersMar. 10, 2026
Monster Energy Presents: Cash Cobain - Party with Slizzy


