California Sheriff Pauses Election Fraud Investigation Amid Legal Challenges

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco faces pushback from state attorney general over ballot seizure.

Mar. 31, 2026 at 6:56pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A solitary ballot box sits on a table in a dimly lit government office, the scene bathed in warm, cinematic lighting and deep shadows, conveying a sense of quiet contemplation over the integrity of the electoral process.The seizure of election materials by a local sheriff has sparked a legal battle over the appropriate handling of sensitive voting data.Riverside Today

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco has paused his investigation into alleged election fraud after seizing more than 650,000 ballots from a state special election last year. The California Attorney General's office has challenged Bianco's actions, arguing he is violating state law by handling election materials outside of established public processes.

Why it matters

This case highlights the ongoing tensions between local law enforcement and state officials over election integrity and the handling of sensitive voting data. It raises questions about the appropriate roles and authorities of different government entities when it comes to investigating potential electoral issues.

The details

Sheriff Bianco recently seized the ballots as part of an investigation into allegations by an activist group that the reported election tallies did not match the actual ballots. However, California Attorney General Rob Bonta has worked to stop Bianco's investigation, arguing he is acting illegally in taking the ballots from the county registrar. A California court denied Bonta's appeal to stop the investigation, but Bonta clarified the denial was based on court jurisdiction, not the merits of the case.

  • On March 31, 2026, Sheriff Bianco announced he was pausing the investigation due to the legal challenges.
  • Last week, a California court denied the Attorney General's appeal to stop Bianco's investigation.

The players

Chad Bianco

The sheriff of Riverside County, California, who launched an investigation into alleged election fraud and seized over 650,000 ballots.

Rob Bonta

The California Attorney General who has worked to stop Bianco's investigation, arguing he is acting illegally in handling the election materials.

Sonni Waknin

The senior voting rights attorney at the UCLA Voting Rights Project, which filed a petition with the California Supreme Court arguing Bianco's ballot seizure violated state law.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Shame on you, the media, for believing an attorney general with a history of lying, then repeating his lies. Shame on you for not watching or paying attention to our press conference.”

— Chad Bianco, Riverside County Sheriff

“These new developments make an already serious situation even more alarming. California law is very clear. Election materials are to remain in the custody of election officials and be handled through established public processes.”

— Sonni Waknin, Senior Voting Rights Attorney, UCLA Voting Rights Project

What’s next

The California Supreme Court will consider the petition filed by the UCLA Voting Rights Project regarding Bianco's handling of the election materials. The Attorney General's office is also evaluating next steps to resolve the matter.

The takeaway

This case highlights the ongoing tensions between local law enforcement and state officials over election integrity and the appropriate processes for investigating potential electoral issues. It raises questions about the balance of power and the roles of different government entities when it comes to sensitive voting data.