- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Capital One Ordered to Pay $10.2M in Riverside Court Judgment
The financial institution was accused of unlawful debt collection practices in California.
Published on Feb. 25, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Capital One Bank N.A. has been ordered to pay $10.2 million in civil penalties and investigative costs after a Riverside County District Attorney's Office investigation found the financial institution engaged in unlawful debt collection activities in California. The settlement was reached in a civil lawsuit filed in Riverside Superior Court by a statewide team of district attorneys from Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, and Santa Clara counties.
Why it matters
This case highlights the ongoing efforts by state and local authorities to crack down on aggressive and illegal debt collection practices that can harass and burden consumers. The large penalty imposed on Capital One sends a strong message that such behavior will not be tolerated.
The details
The complaint alleged that Capital One, directly and through its agents, made debt-collection phone calls to California residents at "unreasonable and excessive frequency." The company also persisted in calling consumers after they stated they no longer wished to receive the calls or when calls were made to wrong numbers. Capital One denied the allegations, but the $10.2 million stipulated judgment requires the company to comply with state and federal laws governing consumer debt collection calls and maintain certain business practices to ensure compliance.
- The civil lawsuit was filed in Riverside Superior Court.
- The $10.2 million stipulated judgment was signed and entered by Riverside Superior Court Judge Harold Hopp on February 19, 2026.
The players
Capital One Bank N.A.
A Nevada-based financial services company that was accused of unlawful debt collection activities in California.
Mike Hestrin
The Riverside County District Attorney who announced the settlement in the civil lawsuit against Capital One.
Harold Hopp
The Riverside Superior Court Judge who signed and entered the $10.2 million stipulated judgment against Capital One.
California Debt Collection Task Force
A statewide law enforcement team composed of district attorneys from Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, and Santa Clara counties that handled the investigation into Capital One.
What’s next
The $10.2 million judgment requires Capital One to comply with state and federal laws governing consumer debt collection calls and maintain certain business practices to ensure compliance.
The takeaway
This case demonstrates the ongoing efforts by state and local authorities to hold financial institutions accountable for aggressive and illegal debt collection practices that can harass and burden consumers. The large penalty imposed on Capital One underscores that such behavior will not be tolerated.
Riverside top stories
Riverside events
Mar. 13, 2026
Elefante 30 Years Tour


