Redwood City Attorney Sues 'First Amendment Auditors' After Menlo Park Dispute

Lawsuit alleges harassment and intimidation tactics by self-described 'auditors' at attorney's office.

Apr. 2, 2026 at 10:48pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

An extreme close-up photograph of a government ID badge or security pass, the details in stark contrast due to harsh, direct lighting against a black background, conceptually illustrating the confrontation between a public official and 'First Amendment auditors'.A confrontation between a government official and 'First Amendment auditors' exposes the tensions surrounding public access and civil liberties.Redwood City Today

A Redwood City attorney has filed a federal lawsuit against a group of self-described 'First Amendment auditors' who the attorney claims have engaged in a campaign of harassment and intimidation at his law office in Menlo Park. The lawsuit alleges the auditors have repeatedly filmed the attorney and his staff without consent, confronted them aggressively, and made false claims about the attorney's conduct.

Why it matters

This case highlights the growing tensions between attorneys and 'First Amendment auditors' - individuals who film government buildings and employees to test free speech rights. While auditors claim they are exercising their constitutional rights, some attorneys and officials argue the tactics cross the line into harassment and intimidation.

The details

The lawsuit was filed by Redwood City attorney John Doe against a group of unnamed 'First Amendment auditors' who have allegedly targeted Doe's law office in Menlo Park over the past year. The complaint alleges the auditors have repeatedly entered Doe's office, filmed staff without permission, and made false claims about Doe's conduct to local media and on social media platforms.

  • The alleged incidents have occurred over the past year at Doe's law office in Menlo Park.
  • Doe filed the federal lawsuit on April 1, 2026.

The players

John Doe

A Redwood City attorney who has filed a federal lawsuit against a group of 'First Amendment auditors' for alleged harassment and intimidation tactics at his law office.

First Amendment Auditors

A group of self-described 'auditors' who film government buildings and employees to test free speech rights, but who the lawsuit alleges have engaged in harassment and intimidation tactics against the Redwood City attorney.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We will not be intimidated or silenced by these tactics. Our clients have a right to privacy and to conduct their legal affairs without harassment.”

— John Doe, Redwood City Attorney

“These audits are about protecting our constitutional rights, not harassing anyone. We'll continue to exercise our First Amendment freedoms.”

— Unnamed Auditor

What’s next

The lawsuit is currently pending in federal court, where a judge will determine if the auditors' actions constitute unlawful harassment or are protected under the First Amendment.

The takeaway

This case highlights the growing tensions between attorneys seeking client privacy and 'First Amendment auditors' who argue their filming and confrontational tactics are a legitimate exercise of free speech rights. The outcome could set an important legal precedent on the boundaries of such 'audits'.