Rose Bowl Wins Key Legal Battle to Keep UCLA Bruins in Pasadena

Judge rejects UCLA's bid to force arbitration, allowing lawsuit to proceed in open court

Feb. 5, 2026 at 8:15pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge has rejected UCLA's attempt to compel arbitration in its breach-of-contract case with the Rose Bowl, meaning the matter will now proceed in open court. The Rose Bowl and the City of Pasadena are suing to keep the Bruins as tenants through 2044, arguing that losing UCLA would cause 'irreparable harm' for which monetary damages would be insufficient.

Why it matters

The Rose Bowl has been the home of UCLA football since 1982, and the stadium has undergone hundreds of millions in taxpayer-backed renovations based on that long-term partnership. The school's efforts to break the lease and move to SoFi Stadium could have major financial and symbolic implications for the iconic venue.

The details

In his ruling, Judge Joseph Lipner wrote that the arbitration clause in the agreement between the parties did not cover this dispute, stating that the 'terms and structure of the agreement evidence an intent by the parties not to include in arbitration disputes about termination of the agreement or attempts to terminate the agreement.' The Rose Bowl's attorneys have argued that losing UCLA would cause 'irreparable harm' and are asking the court to compel the team to remain at the stadium through the end of the lease in 2044.

  • On February 5, 2026, a Los Angeles Superior Court judge rejected UCLA's bid to compel arbitration.
  • The parties are next scheduled to meet in court on February 27, 2026.

The players

Rose Bowl

The iconic sports venue in Pasadena, California that has been the home of UCLA football since 1982.

City of Pasadena

The city that owns the Rose Bowl and has partnered with UCLA for decades.

UCLA Bruins

The university's football team that is seeking to break its lease with the Rose Bowl and move to SoFi Stadium.

Kroenke Sports and Entertainment

The company that owns SoFi Stadium, which is being sued by the Rose Bowl for allegedly interfering in the situation.

Judge Joseph Lipner

The Los Angeles Superior Court judge who rejected UCLA's bid to compel arbitration.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“For more than 40 years, UCLA has benefited from a unique partnership with the City of Pasadena and the Rose Bowl, a partnership that was memorialized in a carefully negotiated contract that extends through 2044.”

— Nima Mohebbi, Partner, Sidley Austin LLP (California Post)

What’s next

The parties are next scheduled to meet in court on February 27, 2026, where the judge will likely set a timeline for the lawsuit to proceed.

The takeaway

This legal battle highlights the high stakes involved as iconic sports venues like the Rose Bowl fight to retain their long-standing collegiate tenants in the face of lucrative offers from newer, more modern facilities. The outcome could have major financial and symbolic implications for both UCLA and the city of Pasadena.