- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Pier Capital Reduces Stake in e.l.f. Beauty
Investment firm cuts holdings in cosmetics company by over 50%
Mar. 13, 2026 at 10:39am
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Pier Capital LLC, an investment management firm, has reduced its stake in e.l.f. Beauty (NYSE: ELF) by 50.4% during the third quarter, according to a recent SEC filing. The firm now owns 58,054 shares of the cosmetics company's stock, down from 117,126 shares previously.
Why it matters
This move by Pier Capital suggests a shift in the investment firm's outlook on e.l.f. Beauty's prospects, potentially signaling broader market sentiment around the company's performance and growth trajectory.
The details
In its 13F filing, Pier Capital reported selling 59,072 shares of e.l.f. Beauty during the third quarter. The firm now holds a 0.10% stake in the company, valued at $7.69 million as of the end of the quarter. e.l.f. Beauty is the 28th largest holding in Pier Capital's investment portfolio.
- Pier Capital filed its 13F report for the third quarter of 2026 on March 13, 2026.
The players
Pier Capital LLC
An investment management firm that has reduced its stake in e.l.f. Beauty by over 50%.
e.l.f. Beauty
An American cosmetics company known for offering a range of affordable, trend-driven makeup and skincare products.
The takeaway
Pier Capital's decision to significantly reduce its position in e.l.f. Beauty could signal broader market concerns about the cosmetics company's performance and growth prospects, though the specific reasons behind the investment firm's move remain unclear.





