Google Settles $68M Privacy Lawsuit Over Google Assistant

Settlement covers users subjected to false activations of voice assistant since 2016.

Jan. 27, 2026 at 2:39pm

Google has agreed to pay $68 million to settle a class action lawsuit alleging its voice-activated Google Assistant illegally recorded and shared private conversations in order to serve targeted ads. The preliminary settlement, which requires court approval, covers users who purchased Google devices or were subjected to false activations of the assistant since May 2016.

Why it matters

The case highlights growing privacy concerns around voice assistants and the potential for misuse of data collected through always-on microphones. It follows a similar $95 million settlement reached by Apple over its Siri assistant in 2024.

The details

Smartphone users accused Google, a unit of Alphabet, of illegally recording and disseminating private conversations after Google Assistant was triggered, in order to send them targeted advertising. Google Assistant is designed to react when people use 'hot words' such as 'Hey Google' or 'Okay Google,' but users objected to receiving ads after the assistant misperceived what they said as hot words, known as 'false accepts'.

  • The preliminary class action settlement was filed on January 23, 2026 in the San Jose, California federal court.
  • The settlement covers people who bought Google devices or were subjected to false accepts since May 18, 2016.

The players

Google

A unit of Alphabet Inc. and the tech giant behind the Google Assistant voice assistant.

Beth Labson Freeman

The U.S. District Judge who must approve the preliminary settlement.

Apple

Reached a similar $95 million settlement with smartphone users over its Siri assistant in December 2024.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The settlement requires approval by U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman before it can be finalized.

The takeaway

This case highlights the growing privacy concerns around voice assistants and the potential for misuse of data collected through always-on microphones. It underscores the need for tech companies to be more transparent and accountable when it comes to user privacy protections.