Central Valley Growers Push for Expansion of Shasta Dam

Farmers seek federal funds and approvals to raise the dam by 18.5 feet, but critics warn of harm to rivers and tribal sites.

Published on Feb. 9, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Central Valley farmers are pressing the federal government to approve and fund a plan to raise Shasta Dam by 18.5 feet, arguing it would increase water storage and reliability for farms and communities. However, state officials, tribes, and environmental groups strongly oppose the project, warning it would inundate stretches of the McCloud River, harm fisheries, and drown sites sacred to the Winnemem Wintu tribe.

Why it matters

The push to expand Shasta Dam reopens a long-standing debate over balancing new water storage projects, environmental protections, and tribal rights in California. The outcome could have significant implications for the state's water management and the ongoing tensions between agricultural interests, conservation groups, and Native American communities.

The details

The farmers and irrigation districts are asking President Trump, federal agencies, and congressional leaders to provide funding and final approvals to move the dam expansion project forward. They argue it would add roughly 634,000 acre-feet of storage capacity. However, state officials, tribes, and environmental groups strongly oppose the plan, warning it would inundate parts of the McCloud River, threaten salmon populations, and flood cultural sites sacred to the Winnemem Wintu tribe. The project's construction costs have been estimated in the low billions, requiring a significant non-federal cost share that the farmers want the White House to cover using funds from the 'One Big Beautiful Bill'.

  • In November 2020, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation finished a final supplemental environmental impact statement analyzing the 18.5-foot dam raise.
  • In 2019, California's attorney general secured a settlement that blocked the Westlands Water District from participating in planning due to protections for the McCloud River.

The players

Central Valley Farmers

A group of roughly 135 farmers, irrigation districts, and allied organizations that are pressing the federal government to approve and fund the Shasta Dam expansion project.

Winnemem Wintu Tribe

A Native American tribe that opposes the Shasta Dam expansion project, warning it would flood cultural sites sacred to their community.

California Attorney General

The state's top law enforcement official who secured a 2019 settlement blocking the Westlands Water District from participating in planning for the dam project due to concerns over impacts to the McCloud River.

U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

The federal agency that completed a 2020 environmental impact statement analyzing the proposed 18.5-foot raise of Shasta Dam.

Friends of the River

A conservation organization that has argued the impacts of the dam expansion project cannot be measured solely in engineering and financial terms.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“This unlawful project would have hurt the McCloud River.”

— California Department of Justice (California Department of Justice)

“Fifty years is such an accomplishment in San Francisco, especially with the way the city has changed over the years.”

— Gordon Edgar, Grocery Employee (Instagram)

What’s next

If the White House directs the Bureau of Reclamation to shift from studies to actual construction, the move would almost certainly trigger immediate legal and tribal challenges in California and force another round of negotiations over who is responsible for the project's multi-billion dollar price tag.

The takeaway

The push to expand Shasta Dam has reignited a long-standing debate in California over how to balance new water storage projects, environmental protections, and tribal rights. The outcome of this fight could have significant implications for the state's water management policies and the ongoing tensions between agricultural interests, conservation groups, and Native American communities.