Federal Judge Blocks DHS From Coercing Immigrant Children to Self-Deport

Ruling says government's advisals to unaccompanied minors violated 40-year-old court order protecting their rights

Apr. 11, 2026 at 10:00am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

A somber, cinematic painting of a young child sitting alone on a bench in a dimly lit government office, the scene bathed in warm, diagonal sunlight and deep shadows, conveying a sense of vulnerability and uncertainty.A solitary immigrant child faces an uncertain future in a sterile government facility, as legal battles continue over the treatment of unaccompanied minors in the immigration system.Los Angeles Today

A federal judge in Los Angeles ordered the Department of Homeland Security to stop using 'blatantly coercive' language to persuade unaccompanied immigrant children to self-deport or face long-term detention. The judge ruled that the new advisals violated a 40-year-old court order that bans immigration agents from pressuring children to give up asylum claims and leave the U.S.

Why it matters

The case highlights ongoing tensions over the treatment of unaccompanied immigrant children, who are considered one of the most vulnerable populations in the immigration system. The judge's ruling reaffirms long-standing legal protections for these minors and underscores concerns that the government may be overstepping its authority in its efforts to curb illegal immigration.

The details

According to court documents, the DHS legal advisal was given to recently detained immigrant children, telling them they could either return to their home countries with no consequences or face prolonged detention if they sought a hearing with an immigration judge or expressed fear of leaving the U.S. The judge said this 'blatantly coercive' language mirrored testimony from a 1980s lawsuit that led to the establishment of due process safeguards for immigrant children.

  • In September 2025, DHS started advising unaccompanied immigrant children they could self-deport or face long-term detention.
  • On April 11, 2026, a federal judge in Los Angeles ordered DHS to stop using the coercive language in its advisals to immigrant children.

The players

U.S. District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald

The federal judge in the Central District of California who ruled that DHS's advisals to immigrant children violated a 40-year-old court order protecting their rights.

Jose Antonio Perez-Funez

A plaintiff in a 1980s class-action lawsuit whose testimony about being pressured by federal officers to self-deport led to the establishment of due process safeguards for immigrant children.

Mark Rosenbaum

An attorney at the pro bono law firm Public Counsel who helped secure the 1986 court order that the judge ruled DHS had violated.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

The agency that provided a statement defending the advisal document as explaining immigrant children's rights and options under federal law.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What’s next

The government has until Thursday to decide whether it will appeal the judge's ruling. Regardless, the goal is to establish more aggressive monitoring of unaccompanied children's cases to ensure their rights aren't violated again.

The takeaway

This case underscores the ongoing legal battles over the treatment of unaccompanied immigrant children, who are considered one of the most vulnerable populations in the immigration system. The judge's ruling reaffirms long-standing protections for these minors and signals that the government cannot use coercive tactics to pressure them into self-deporting.