Cases Dismissed Against Juvenile Hall Officers Accused of 'Gladiator-Style' Fights

Prosecutors drop nearly half of the cases, citing 'continued consideration of all evidence' as some officers complete community service.

Apr. 9, 2026 at 2:12am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

An extreme close-up photograph of a set of handcuffs on a dark background, lit by a harsh, direct camera flash, conceptually representing the investigation and legal process surrounding the alleged misconduct at the juvenile hall.The dismissal of charges against some juvenile hall officers raises questions about the initial investigation and the need for a fair, fact-based approach to accountability.Los Angeles Today

State prosecutors in California have quietly dismissed nearly half of the cases against 30 Los Angeles County probation employees indicted last year for allegedly allowing and potentially encouraging 69 fights, including 'gladiator'-style fight clubs, at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall. The California Attorney General's Office acknowledged the dismissals, stating that some defendants were 'appropriately dismissed' based on the factual circumstances, while others will 'continue to be prosecuted in accordance with the law'.

Why it matters

The dismissals raise concerns about due process and whether there was a 'rush to judgment' in the initial indictments, which had already 'maligned an entire profession' of probation officers. The case also highlights ongoing challenges at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall, which has been deemed 'unsuitable' by state regulators and is involved in legal battles over its future.

The details

The indictment had alleged that probation officers Smyles and Brooks allowed up to nine combatants to engage in fights that occurred at least five times over a six-month period in 2023. The officers were also accused of warning new officers not to document the fights and telling one youth involved to 'refuse treatment' for a broken nose. However, some of the dismissed cases involved officers who had only been assigned to the juvenile hall for a short time and had no knowledge of the alleged fights.

  • In December 2023, Smyles, Brooks and Sostre allegedly allowed one youth to participate in 'eight one-on-one fights' that led to him sustaining a broken nose.
  • In December 2023, Smyles gave a 'briefing' to new detention service officers and told them the fights were 'how they operated and controlled the youths and the unit'.

The players

Rob Bonta

The California Attorney General, who stated that some defendants were 'appropriately dismissed' based on the factual circumstances, while others will 'continue to be prosecuted in accordance with the law'.

Tom Yu

An attorney who represents one of the four probation officers who pleaded no contest, stating that his client's case will be dismissed once he completes 40 hours of community service.

Curtis Chambers

The president of the Los Angeles County Probation Officers Union, who said the dismissals raise 'serious concerns about whether due process has been followed from the start'.

Regino Torres Jr.

The president of the Supervising Deputy Probation Officers Association, who said there should have been a 'careful, fact-based review from the very beginning'.

Smyles and Brooks

Probation officers who were accused of allowing and potentially encouraging the 'gladiator'-style fights at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We bring charges based on the law and the facts as we know them. And we determine the criminal culpability of each individual based on their specific and unique actions. That's what justice and the law require. We will continue to be firm and fair as we work to secure accountability for criminal conduct that harms Californians.”

— Rob Bonta, California Attorney General

“I'm glad this nightmare is over for my client.”

— Tom Yu, Attorney

“What we are seeing raises real questions about a rush to judgment, one that has already had the effect of maligning an entire profession without the facts being fully vetted.”

— Curtis Chambers, President, Los Angeles County Probation Officers Union

“These cases placed supervising officers that we represent in extraordinarily difficult situations, and too many were swept into charges that did not reflect the realities of their daily work. Accountability matters, but it must go hand in hand with fairness and due process. Our members deserve both.”

— Regino Torres Jr., President, Supervising Deputy Probation Officers Association

What’s next

The remaining 16 cases against probation officers are expected to be dismissed or resolved through community service over the next few months as prosecutors continue to review the evidence.

The takeaway

This case highlights the importance of due process and thorough investigation, even in high-profile cases involving alleged misconduct by public officials. The dismissals raise questions about the initial indictments and the potential damage done to the reputations of probation officers, underscoring the need for a balanced and fair approach to accountability.