- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Charges Against L.A. Juvenile Hall Staffers in 'Gladiator Fight' Cases Dismissed
State prosecutors drop charges against over a third of the 30 probation officers accused of coordinating fights between youths
Apr. 7, 2026 at 10:26pm
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
The dismissal of charges against many probation officers accused of enabling 'gladiator fights' at L.A. juvenile halls raises questions about the integrity of the investigation.Los Angeles TodayMore than a year after California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced indictments against 30 probation officers accused of coordinating or allowing 'gladiator fights' between youths inside L.A. County juvenile halls, almost half of the criminal cases are falling apart. State prosecutors have dismissed charges against at least 10 of the 30 officers, with an additional four entering plea deals that will end their cases.
Why it matters
The indictments and prosecutions were seen as a crackdown on a troubling practice of probation officers allegedly rewarding or allowing fights between incarcerated youths. However, the dismissals and plea deals have raised questions about whether the charges were overreached and whether the process was flawed from the start.
The details
Many of the other alleged fight incidents were different from the 2023 video that sparked the investigation, lasting only seconds, involving minimal injuries, and ending after probation officers intervened. Attorneys for the officers and probation union officials said the prosecutions were an overreaction to the video, and that truly innocent probation officers following directives were swept up. Some motions to dismiss paint the officers as rookies deferring to superiors like Taneha Brooks and Shawn Smyles, who were allegedly the main drivers of the fights.
- In 2024, a video was first published by The Times showing officers standing by as several youths pummeled a fellow inmate at Los Padrinos Juvenile Hall.
- In 2025, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced indictments against 30 probation officers.
- In recent weeks, state prosecutors have dismissed charges against at least 10 of the 30 officers.
- On Tuesday, four additional officers entered into plea deals that will end their cases after completing community service.
The players
Rob Bonta
The California Attorney General who announced the indictments against the 30 probation officers last year.
Taneha Brooks
A probation officer at the center of the Los Padrinos juvenile hall fight video, who remains charged with multiple counts of child abuse and conspiracy.
Shawn Smyles
A probation officer at the center of the Los Padrinos juvenile hall fight video, who remains charged with multiple counts of child abuse and conspiracy.
Curtis Chambers
The president of the union that represents rank-and-file probation officers, who questioned the rush to judgment and whether the process was flawed.
Ramses Patron
A high-ranking probation officer whose case will be dismissed after a plea agreement, after being charged with child abuse for failing to stop a fight that lasted less than 10 seconds.
What they’re saying
“I believe the case was a reactionary case that was overcharged. They swept in a bunch of truly innocent probation officers who were following directives and doing their jobs.”
— Adam Koppekin, Attorney representing an officer whose case was dismissed
“What we are seeing raises real questions about a rush to judgment, one that has already had the effect of maligning an entire profession without the facts being fully vetted. When cases begin to fall apart after being advanced so publicly, it is fair to ask whether the process itself was flawed from the outset.”
— Curtis Chambers, President of the probation officers' union
“There's no words to describe what my client and his family went through.”
— Tom Yu, Attorney for Ramses Patron
What’s next
The attorney general's office said it will continue to adjust its treatment of defendants based on all evidence developed before, during and after criminal charges were initiated. The dismissals and plea deals have also raised questions about the attorney general's fitness to take over the probation department to enforce needed reforms, a move he has been seeking court permission to make.
The takeaway
This case highlights the complexities and potential pitfalls of high-profile prosecutions, where a rush to judgment can lead to overcharging and maligning an entire profession. The dismissals and plea deals suggest the need for thorough vetting of evidence and a more nuanced approach to addressing systemic issues in the juvenile justice system.
Los Angeles top stories
Los Angeles events
Apr. 7, 2026
Monty Python's Spamalot (Touring)Apr. 7, 2026
Los Angeles Lakers vs. Oklahoma City ThunderApr. 7, 2026
Dark Tranquillity & Soen




