LA Superior Court Reveals 464,000 Unreported Criminal Cases

Decades-old technical issues left thousands of convictions and dismissals unrecorded with state authorities.

Published on Feb. 24, 2026

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Los Angeles Superior Court has disclosed that roughly 464,000 criminal case results dating back to the 1980s were never reported to the California Department of Justice, affecting the official records of over 400,000 individuals. The court cited technical shortcomings in its decades-old case management system as the cause of the massive reporting backlog, which was discovered during a technology modernization project.

Why it matters

This oversight means that the criminal histories of hundreds of thousands of Californians may not accurately reflect their full record, potentially impacting employment, housing, and other areas where background checks are required. The revelation raises concerns about the reliability of the state's criminal justice data and the court's ability to properly manage and report case information.

The details

According to the court, the backlog included about 380,000 convictions (147,000 felonies, 233,000 misdemeanors) and 84,000 case dismissals (61,000 felonies, 23,000 misdemeanors) that were never reported to the state DOJ. The affected cases spanned from the early 1980s to 2023 and involved roughly 408,000 individual defendants. The court says it is now working to transmit all the unreported cases to the DOJ, which will update the state's records accordingly.

  • The reporting backlog was discovered in 2023 during a technology modernization project that began roughly a decade ago.
  • The unreported cases span from the early 1980s to 2023.

The players

Los Angeles Superior Court

The superior court system for Los Angeles County, California, which oversees criminal and civil cases in the region.

California Department of Justice

The state law enforcement agency responsible for maintaining criminal records and background check databases in California.

David W. Slayton

The Executive Officer and Clerk of the Los Angeles Superior Court.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“The court is committed to building public trust and confidence in the judicial system, and that demands transparency when the court falls short of its standards.”

— David W. Slayton, Executive Officer and Clerk of Court (pasadenanow.com)

“At the end of the day, it is most important that the criminal history records be complete and accurate, and the court has taken steps to ensure this is the case.”

— David W. Slayton, Executive Officer and Clerk of Court (pasadenanow.com)

What’s next

The court is collaborating with the California Department of Justice to process the backlog of unreported cases as quickly as possible, and has implemented new systems to prevent any future failures in reporting criminal case outcomes to state authorities.

The takeaway

This incident highlights the critical importance of maintaining accurate and up-to-date criminal records, as well as the need for courts to have robust case management systems and reporting protocols in place. The LA Superior Court's transparency in acknowledging this oversight is a positive step, but the ramifications for hundreds of thousands of individuals whose records may be incomplete are significant.