Zuckerberg Testifies in Lawsuit Over Social Media Addiction

Meta CEO faces accusations that social platforms are designed to addict young users.

Feb. 22, 2026 at 2:47pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

In a high-profile trial in Los Angeles, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg took the stand to defend his company against allegations that social media platforms like Facebook and Instagram are intentionally designed to addict young users, causing mental health issues and other harms.

Why it matters

The lawsuit represents a major legal challenge to the business models of social media giants, which have long faced criticism that their products exploit psychological vulnerabilities, especially in minors. The outcome could set important precedents around platform liability and the duty of care owed to users.

The details

Zuckerberg was grilled by opposing lawyers over internal research and documents that allegedly show Meta was aware of the addictive nature of its products and the mental health impacts, particularly on teenagers and children. The company has denied these claims and argued its platforms provide valuable connectivity and community.

  • The trial began on February 15, 2026 in a Los Angeles courtroom.

The players

Mark Zuckerberg

The co-founder and CEO of Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram, and other social media platforms.

Meta

The multinational technology conglomerate that owns and operates social media platforms including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and others.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“Our goal has always been to build products that bring people together and provide value in their lives.”

— Mark Zuckerberg

What’s next

The trial is expected to last several weeks, with a verdict potentially coming in late March or early April 2026.

The takeaway

This high-profile lawsuit represents a major legal challenge to the business models of social media giants, which have long faced criticism over the addictive nature and mental health impacts of their platforms, especially on young users. The outcome could set important precedents around platform liability and the duty of care owed to users.