- Today
- Holidays
- Birthdays
- Reminders
- Cities
- Atlanta
- Austin
- Baltimore
- Berwyn
- Beverly Hills
- Birmingham
- Boston
- Brooklyn
- Buffalo
- Charlotte
- Chicago
- Cincinnati
- Cleveland
- Columbus
- Dallas
- Denver
- Detroit
- Fort Worth
- Houston
- Indianapolis
- Knoxville
- Las Vegas
- Los Angeles
- Louisville
- Madison
- Memphis
- Miami
- Milwaukee
- Minneapolis
- Nashville
- New Orleans
- New York
- Omaha
- Orlando
- Philadelphia
- Phoenix
- Pittsburgh
- Portland
- Raleigh
- Richmond
- Rutherford
- Sacramento
- Salt Lake City
- San Antonio
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- San Jose
- Seattle
- Tampa
- Tucson
- Washington
Los Altos Hills Today
By the People, for the People
South Bay Cities Face Soaring Costs for County Police Services
Saratoga, Cupertino, and Los Altos Hills grapple with 35% hike in contract rates from Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department
Published on Mar. 5, 2026
Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›
Three South Bay cities - Saratoga, Cupertino, and Los Altos Hills - are facing a dramatic increase in the cost of contracting police services from the Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department. The county says the cost of doing business has skyrocketed, requiring a roughly 35% hike in contract rates to cover the rising expenses. However, the mayors of the affected cities argue the math doesn't add up and are exploring alternatives like contracting with other agencies or creating their own police departments, though the latter may not be financially feasible.
Why it matters
This dispute highlights the financial pressures facing local governments as the costs of providing public safety services continue to rise. The outcome could set a precedent for how other cities in the region negotiate with the county for police services, and may force some to make difficult budget decisions that could impact other municipal services.
The details
The Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department has provided police services to Saratoga, Cupertino, and Los Altos Hills since the 1950s. But the county says the cost of doing business has dramatically changed since the last contract negotiation in 2014, requiring a roughly 35% increase in contract rates to cover rising expenses like upgraded technology and systems. The mayors of the three cities argue the proposed hike is excessive and want a clearer breakdown of the overhead costs before agreeing to the new terms. They are exploring alternatives like contracting with other nearby agencies or creating their own police departments, though the latter may be financially impossible.
- The current contract between the cities and the county expires on June 30, 2026.
- The county first notified the cities of the impending rate hike in early 2026.
The players
Santa Clara County Sheriff's Department
The law enforcement agency that has provided police services to Saratoga, Cupertino, and Los Altos Hills since the 1950s.
Saratoga Mayor Chuck Page
The mayor of Saratoga who has been involved in city politics since 2006 and says public safety is a top priority.
James Williams
The Santa Clara County Executive who says the rate hike is solely about cost recovery for the county's law enforcement services.
What they’re saying
“We knew that we were going to have an increase. They had sent us a letter saying that we were going to, and we should anticipate a larger increase than normal, but five times is a bit more than we expected.”
— Chuck Page, Mayor of Saratoga (cbsnews.com)
“This is only about cost recovery. It's about cost recovery for the direct deputies on the ground, but also the investigations and records and other related services that inherently are part of delivering law enforcement to these communities.”
— James Williams, Santa Clara County Executive (cbsnews.com)
What’s next
The county and the cities have until June 30, 2026 to reach an agreement on the new contract terms. Mayor Page is hopeful they can come up with a deal to keep their communities safe, though he acknowledges that changing law enforcement services in six months will be challenging.
The takeaway
This dispute highlights the financial pressures facing local governments as the costs of providing public safety services continue to rise. The outcome could set a precedent for how other cities in the region negotiate with the county for police services, and may force some to make difficult budget decisions that could impact other municipal services.


