Draper Gracious in Defeat Despite Controversial Hindrance Call Against Medvedev

British player questions referee's decision but praises opponent's superior play in Indian Wells quarterfinal match.

Mar. 13, 2026 at 11:45am

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

Jack Draper was defeated by Daniil Medvedev in a match overshadowed by a disputed hindrance ruling, though the British player insisted he held no anger toward his Russian opponent. Draper acknowledged Medvedev's superiority while questioning the referee's decision to penalize him, saying he didn't think his actions were enough to distract Medvedev. Medvedev admitted the situation was uncomfortable but denied any wrongdoing, saying he was only slightly distracted and let the referee make the call.

Why it matters

The incident has sparked debate over the interpretation of hindrance rules in tennis, raising questions about how officials should handle such situations. However, both players showed respect toward each other, leaving the referee's judgment as the decisive factor in the match outcome.

The details

In the quarterfinal match at the Indian Wells tournament, Draper explained that the rally continued and he won the point after the hindrance call, which made the penalty feel excessive. 'I think he's played the rules quite well. The rally carried on and I was able to win the point so I don't think I should have lost the point. I think it's pretty harsh,' he said.

  • The match took place on March 12, 2026.

The players

Jack Draper

A 24-year-old British tennis player currently ranked no. 14 in the world.

Daniil Medvedev

A Russian tennis player currently ranked no. 11 in the world, who advanced to the semifinals of the Indian Wells tournament.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“First of all, Daniil was the stronger player fair and square. It's a difficult situation for the ref. I don't think I did enough to hinder him, but at the end of the day I did make a slight thing with my hands.”

— Jack Draper, British tennis player (BBC Sport)

“Was I distracted big time? No. Was I distracted a bit? Yes. Is it enough to win the point? I don't know. If you look on the first forehand I do after it happened, I think I could have done a better shot if there was no gesture from Jack. Do I feel good about it? Not really, but I also don't feel like I cheated. I let the referee decide.”

— Daniil Medvedev, Russian tennis player (Sky Sports)

What’s next

The incident has sparked debate over the interpretation of hindrance rules in tennis, and it remains to be seen if any changes or clarifications will be made to the rules in the aftermath of this match.

The takeaway

Despite the controversial hindrance call, both Draper and Medvedev showed sportsmanship and respect for each other, acknowledging that the referee's judgment was the decisive factor in the match outcome. The incident highlights the complexities of interpreting and applying hindrance rules in professional tennis.