Supreme Court Rejects Jan. 6 Rioter's Demand to Undo Trump Pardon

The high court declined to hear a petition from a defendant seeking to continue appealing his conviction despite receiving a presidential pardon.

Mar. 10, 2026 at 10:20pm

Got story updates? Submit your updates here. ›

The Supreme Court has declined to hear a petition from January 6 defendant Glenn Brooks, who sought to continue appealing his conviction despite receiving a presidential pardon from former President Donald Trump. Brooks' lawyers argued that the pardon operated as a "compelled confession" and stripped him of his right to appeal, but the lower courts had already dismissed his appeal as moot after the pardon was issued.

Why it matters

Brooks' case touches on the complex legal issues surrounding presidential pardons, including whether a defendant can refuse a pardon in order to continue seeking exoneration through the courts. The Supreme Court's decision leaves the lower court's dismissal of Brooks' appeal intact, affirming that a presidential pardon forgives a federal offense but does not erase or vacate the underlying conviction.

The details

Brooks was convicted on four misdemeanor counts related to his actions during the January 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol. He was sentenced to six months in prison and ordered to pay $500 in restitution and a $2,000 fine. While his appeal was pending, Trump pardoned Brooks along with over 1,600 other January 6 defendants. Brooks' lawyers argued that he had made clear he did not want to accept the pardon, as he sought to vindicate his innocence on appeal. However, the lower courts dismissed his appeal as moot after the pardon was issued.

  • On January 6, 2021, Capitol Police clashed with rioters who forced their way into the Capitol as Congress met to certify the 2020 presidential election results.
  • In early 2021, Trump issued pardons for nearly 1,600 people charged in connection with the Capitol attack.
  • Brooks was initially arrested in 2021 following a tip from a member of his church prayer text group.
  • The Supreme Court denied Brooks' petition for certiorari on Monday, March 10, 2026.

The players

Glenn Brooks

A January 6 defendant who sought to continue appealing his conviction despite receiving a presidential pardon from former President Donald Trump.

Alexander Roots

The attorney representing Glenn Brooks.

Donald Trump

The former President of the United States who issued pardons for nearly 1,600 people charged in connection with the January 6 Capitol attack.

Got photos? Submit your photos here. ›

What they’re saying

“We felt this case presented an important issue, and it's unfortunate the Supreme Court declined to take it up. The end result is that Mr. Brooks will never have the opportunity to fully vindicate himself in a court of law.”

— Alexander Roots, Attorney for Glenn Brooks

“A forced pardon operates as a compelled confession, branding the individual with guilt and stripping him of his chosen appellate forum.”

— Alexander Roots, Attorney for Glenn Brooks

The takeaway

The Supreme Court's decision affirms that a presidential pardon forgives a federal offense but does not erase or vacate the underlying conviction, even if the defendant seeks to continue appealing the case to clear their name. This case highlights the complex legal issues surrounding the use of presidential pardons, particularly in high-profile cases related to major political events like the January 6 Capitol attack.